Neil A. Powe
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Transportation top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Guy GarrodK. G. WillisIan J. BatemanKenneth G. WillisSeraphim AlvanidesTrevor HartTapan Kumar ShawKen Willis
- Topics
- Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers)Rural development and sustainability (11 papers)Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Neil A. Powe
44 papers receiving 888 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Economics and Econometrics 552
- Global and Planetary Change 240
- Transportation 149
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 137
- Marketing 121
Countries citing papers authored by Neil A. Powe
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil A. Powe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil A. Powe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil A. Powe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil A. Powe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil A. Powe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil A. Powe. The network helps show where Neil A. Powe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil A. Powe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil A. Powe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil A. Powe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil A. Powe. Neil A. Powe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | Capacity vs. need: Exploring regional differences in housing provision in market towns | 3 |
| 9 | 41 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 90 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | The Social and Environmental Benefits of Forestry in Great Britain | 1 |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 71 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Neil A. Powe
Neil A. Powe is a scholar working on Urban Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Demography, having authored 45 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (15 papers), Rural development and sustainability (11 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (50 citations), Transportation (149 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (552 citations). Neil A. Powe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Guy Garrod, K. G. Willis, Ian J. Bateman, Kenneth G. Willis, Seraphim Alvanides, Trevor Hart, Tapan Kumar Shaw, Ken Willis, Eric Ruto and Ian H. Langford. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Journal of Environmental Management and Urban Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.