Neena Malik
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 1%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Child Abuse and Trauma
Papers in
- Health 9
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence 8
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 11
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 10
- Co-authors
- Kristin M. LindahlBrian L. B. WilloughbyNathan D. DotyKaren J. KaczynskiJean‐Philippe LaurenceauJeffrey L.EdlesonNeil W. BorisRachel Chazan‐Cohen
- Journals
- Journal of Family Psychology (6 papers)Infant Mental Health Journal (4 papers)Journal of Interpersonal Violence (4 papers)Journal of GLBT Family Studies (2 papers)Psychology of Men & Masculinity (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Neena Malik
32 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Social Psychology 1.0k
- Clinical Psychology 740
- Reproductive Medicine 246
- Demography 321
- Health 218
Countries citing papers authored by Neena Malik
This map shows the geographic impact of Neena Malik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neena Malik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neena Malik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neena Malik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neena Malik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neena Malik. The network helps show where Neena Malik may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Neena Malik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 243 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 67 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 66 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 44 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 160 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 16 | System for coding interactions in dyads (SCID) | 2004 | 38 |
| 17 | 2001 | 48 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 37 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 132 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 16 |
About Neena Malik
Neena Malik is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, Demography, Clinical Psychology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (11 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (10 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (6 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Clinical Psychology (740 citations), Reproductive Medicine (246 citations), Demography (321 citations) and Health (218 citations). Neena Malik has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kristin M. Lindahl, Brian L. B. Willoughby, Nathan D. Doty, Karen J. Kaczynski, Jean‐Philippe Laurenceau, Jeffrey L.Edleson, Neil W. Boris, Rachel Chazan‐Cohen, Jane Squires and Sherryl Scott Heller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Family Psychology, Infant Mental Health Journal, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of GLBT Family Studies and Psychology of Men & Masculinity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.