N.B. Mulchandani
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- L.P. BadhekaS. R. VenkatachalamB. BenjaminM.S. ChadhaG. S. VermaSathiyanarayanan Kulathu IyerT. S. S. DikshithR. B. Raizada
- Topics
- Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (11 papers)Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (7 papers)Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsJournal of Chromatography APhytochemistry
- Partner nations
- India
In The Last Decade
N.B. Mulchandani
36 papers receiving 448 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Plant Science 241
- Molecular Biology 180
- Pharmacology 179
- Biochemistry 111
- Food Science 82
Countries citing papers authored by N.B. Mulchandani
This map shows the geographic impact of N.B. Mulchandani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.B. Mulchandani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.B. Mulchandani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by N.B. Mulchandani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.B. Mulchandani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.B. Mulchandani. The network helps show where N.B. Mulchandani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of N.B. Mulchandani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N.B. Mulchandani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N.B. Mulchandani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N.B. Mulchandani. N.B. Mulchandani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aristolactams and 4 5 dioxoaporphines from indian piper species | 12 |
| 2 | 74 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About N.B. Mulchandani
N.B. Mulchandani is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Plant Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (11 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (7 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (179 citations), Biochemistry (111 citations) and Plant Science (241 citations). N.B. Mulchandani has collaborated with scholars based in India. Frequent co-authors include L.P. Badheka, S. R. Venkatachalam, B. Benjamin, M.S. Chadha, G. S. Verma, Sathiyanarayanan Kulathu Iyer, T. S. S. Dikshith, R. B. Raizada, Bhaskar Sen Gupta and V. K. Wadhawan. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Chromatography A and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.