Nathaniel H. Sherden
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods 4
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 4
- Inorganic Chemistry top 1%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 3
- Catalysis top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 4
-
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 4
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 2
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 1
-
- History and advancements in chemistry 1
- Co-authors
- Brian M. StoltzHugo E. GottliebAlexander J. M. MillerJohn E. BercawKaren I. GoldbergAbraham NudelmanSarah E. O’ConnorDouglas C. Behenna
- Journals
- Nature (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Angewandte Chemie International Edition (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel H. Sherden
11 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Process Chemistry and Technology 234
- Organic Chemistry 2.3k
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.1k
- Catalysis 141
- Pharmaceutical Science 122
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel H. Sherden
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel H. Sherden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel H. Sherden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel H. Sherden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel H. Sherden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel H. Sherden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel H. Sherden. The network helps show where Nathaniel H. Sherden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel H. Sherden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 49 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 259 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 108 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 171 | |
| 9 | NMR Chemical Shifts of Trace Impurities: Common Laboratory Solvents, Organics, and Gases in Deuterated Solvents Relevant to the Organometallic Chemistbreakdown → | 2010 | 3246 |
| 10 | 2009 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 33 |
About Nathaniel H. Sherden
Nathaniel H. Sherden is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Inorganic Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (4 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper) and History and advancements in chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (234 citations), Organic Chemistry (2.3k citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (1.1k citations). Nathaniel H. Sherden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Brian M. Stoltz, Hugo E. Gottlieb, Alexander J. M. Miller, John E. Bercaw, Karen I. Goldberg, Abraham Nudelman, Sarah E. O’Connor, Douglas C. Behenna, Fernando Geu‐Flores and Scott C. Virgil. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.