John A. Enquist
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids
- Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry
- Inorganic Chemistry top 10%
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Papers in
-
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 3
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 3
- Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 1
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 1
-
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 4
- Co-authors
- Brian M. Stoltz (6 shared papers)Scott C. Virgil (2 shared papers)John L. Wood (3 shared papers)Ke Kong (3 shared papers)Elnaz Menhaji‐Klotz (1 shared paper)Kousuke Tani (1 shared paper)Justin T. Mohr (1 shared paper)Douglas C. Behenna (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Chemistry - A European Journal (2 papers)The Journal of Antibiotics (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Organic Letters (1 paper)Tetrahedron (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John A. Enquist
9 papers receiving 599 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Organic Chemistry 545
- Inorganic Chemistry 131
- Pharmacology 58
- Biotechnology 54
- Biochemistry 45
Countries citing papers authored by John A. Enquist
This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Enquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Enquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Enquist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Enquist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Enquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Enquist. The network helps show where John A. Enquist may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside John A. Enquist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 229 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 171 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 57 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 |
About John A. Enquist
John A. Enquist is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biotechnology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (4 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (3 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (3 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (1 paper) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (545 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (131 citations), Pharmacology (58 citations), Biotechnology (54 citations) and Biochemistry (45 citations). John A. Enquist has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian M. Stoltz, Scott C. Virgil, John L. Wood, Ke Kong, Elnaz Menhaji‐Klotz, Kousuke Tani, Justin T. Mohr, Douglas C. Behenna, Nathaniel H. Sherden and Michael R. Krout. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, The Journal of Antibiotics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Organic Letters and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.