Nathan Rutherford
Impact in
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
-
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 3
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 1
-
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 1
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics 1
- Co-authors
- Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (3 shared papers)Anna L. Watts (3 shared papers)G. Raaijmakers (3 shared papers)Tuomo Salmi (2 shared papers)A. Schwenk (1 shared paper)S. Vinciguerra (1 shared paper)J. Keller (1 shared paper)K. Hebeler (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Physical review. D (1 paper)The Astrophysical Journal Letters (1 paper)The Journal of Open Source Software (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Nathan Rutherford
3 papers receiving 96 citations
Nathan Rutherford's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 12
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 98
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 26
- Oceanography 20
- Geophysics 18
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 27
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Rutherford
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Rutherford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Rutherford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Rutherford. The network helps show where Nathan Rutherford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Rutherford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 54 | |
| 2 | Constraining the Dense Matter Equation of State with New NICER Mass–Radius Measurements and New Chiral Effective Field Theory Inputs Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 51 |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 1 |
About Nathan Rutherford
Nathan Rutherford is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Oceanography, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (3 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (1 paper), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (1 paper), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (1 paper) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (98 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (26 citations), Oceanography (20 citations), Geophysics (18 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (27 citations). Nathan Rutherford has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, Anna L. Watts, G. Raaijmakers, Tuomo Salmi, A. Schwenk, S. Vinciguerra, J. Keller, K. Hebeler, Devarshi Choudhury and Sébastien Guillot. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and The Journal of Open Source Software.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.