Nathan J. Newton
- Accounting top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael S. WilkinsDechun WangJulie S. PersellinBrant E. ChristensenAnne ThompsonElaine MauldinJere R. FrancisPhillip T. Lamoreaux
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (23 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (10 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nathan J. Newton
22 papers receiving 735 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Accounting 660
- Strategy and Management 239
- Finance 160
- Economics and Econometrics 115
- Management Information Systems 77
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan J. Newton
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan J. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan J. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan J. Newton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan J. Newton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan J. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan J. Newton. The network helps show where Nathan J. Newton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan J. Newton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan J. Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan J. Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan J. Newton. Nathan J. Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Does the Disclosure of PCAOB Inspection Findings Increase Audit Firms' Litigation Exposure? | 1 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 91 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 138 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | Earnings Management Pressure on Audit Clients: Auditor Response to Analyst Forecast Signals | 0 |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Nathan J. Newton
Nathan J. Newton is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and General Decision Sciences, having authored 24 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (23 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (10 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (660 citations), Strategy and Management (239 citations) and Finance (160 citations). Nathan J. Newton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Wilkins, Dechun Wang, Julie S. Persellin, Brant E. Christensen, Anne Thompson, Elaine Mauldin, Jere R. Francis, Phillip T. Lamoreaux, Sean T. McGuire and Nathan Y. Sharp. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Accounting Organizations and Society and Contemporary Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.