Nathan Y. Sharp
- Accounting top 0.2%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 46
- Corporate Finance and Governance 25
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies 3
- Finance top 0.5%
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 25
- Strategy and Management top 1%
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 10
-
- Accounting and Organizational Management 5
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
-
- Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems 4
-
- Communication in Education and Healthcare 3
- Co-authors
- Thomas C. OmerAndrew C. CallLawrence D. BrownMichael B. ClementSean T. McGuireDavid A. WoodDouglas F. PrawittMohan Venkatachalam
- Journals
- Review of Accounting Studies (4 papers)Journal of Accounting and Economics (3 papers)Journal of Accounting Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Nathan Y. Sharp
53 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Accounting 3.4k
- Finance 1.4k
- Strategy and Management 1.0k
- Management Information Systems 347
- General Decision Sciences 65
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Y. Sharp
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Y. Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Y. Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Y. Sharp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Y. Sharp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Y. Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Y. Sharp. The network helps show where Nathan Y. Sharp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Y. Sharp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 6 | A response to “are a few huge outcomes distorting financial misconduct research?” | 2019 | 1 |
| 7 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 58 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 75 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 18 |
About Nathan Y. Sharp
Nathan Y. Sharp is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 56 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (46 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (25 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (25 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (10 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (3.4k citations), Finance (1.4k citations) and Strategy and Management (1.0k citations). Nathan Y. Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas C. Omer, Andrew C. Call, Lawrence D. Brown, Michael B. Clement, Sean T. McGuire, David A. Wood, Douglas F. Prawitt, Mohan Venkatachalam, William J. Mayew and R. Arlen Price. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Accounting Studies, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research, Accounting Horizons and Contemporary Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.