Nathan Grant Smith

84 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Nathan Grant Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Social Psychology 1.0k
  • Gender Studies 330
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 352
  • Clinical Psychology 531
  • Aquatic Science 176
Replace Michael Hendricks with:
Michael Hendricks United States
James S. Chisholm United States
William E. Cross United States
J. Camille Hall United States
David Knox United States
Julia C. Phillips United States
Elizabeth Wilson United States
Jean Gérard France
Brian B. Boutwell United States
Wendy Walsh United States
Nathan Grant Smith relative to Michael Hendricks United States Michael Hendricks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Michael Hendricks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Grant Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Grant Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Grant Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Grant Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Grant Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Grant Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Grant Smith. The network helps show where Nathan Grant Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Grant Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Grant Smith Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Grant Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004157
2 2013148
3 2013123
4 200191
5 201485
6 200383
7 201483
8 200481
9 200065
10 201561
11 201350
12 201243
13 201341
14 201036
15 201735
16 201532
17 200932
18 201332
19 201330
20 201028

About Nathan Grant Smith

Nathan Grant Smith is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Aquatic Science, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (29 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (27 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (16 papers), Marine and fisheries research (15 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (7 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (6 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.0k citations), Gender Studies (330 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (352 citations), Clinical Psychology (531 citations) and Aquatic Science (176 citations). Nathan Grant Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen M. Ingram, Chérie Moody, David L. Buckmeier, Daniel J. Daugherty, Laura A. King, Sonia Lupien, Shireen Sindi, Robert‐Paul Juster, Erica J. Mindes and Émilie Ouellet. Their work appears in journals such as North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, The Counseling Psychologist, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity and Physical Review Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact