Nathan C. Keim

95 total papers · 1.9k total citations
38 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Nathan C. Keim is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan C. Keim has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Materials Chemistry, 11 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Nathan C. Keim's work include Material Dynamics and Properties (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers) and Micro and Nano Robotics (5 papers). Nathan C. Keim is often cited by papers focused on Material Dynamics and Properties (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers) and Micro and Nano Robotics (5 papers). Nathan C. Keim collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Brazil. Nathan C. Keim's co-authors include Paulo E. Arratia, Sidney R. Nagel, Joseph D. Paulsen, Thomas A Caswell, Daniel Allan, Srikanth Sastry, Zorana Zeravcic, Casper van der Wel, Wendy W. Zhang and Peder Møller and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Reviews of Modern Physics.

In The Last Decade

Nathan C. Keim

38 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nathan C. Keim 482 258 230 208 159 38 1.0k
Irmgard Bischofberger 280 0.6× 125 0.5× 214 0.9× 204 1.0× 140 0.9× 35 946
Carl P. Goodrich 495 1.0× 223 0.9× 176 0.8× 116 0.6× 195 1.2× 26 902
Carolina Brito 552 1.1× 282 1.1× 178 0.8× 104 0.5× 97 0.6× 36 888
Vijayakumar Chikkadi 648 1.3× 435 1.7× 264 1.1× 223 1.1× 203 1.3× 26 1.2k
Maria L. Ekiel-Jeżewska 359 0.7× 176 0.7× 403 1.8× 403 1.9× 62 0.4× 81 1.2k
Alain Pocheau 491 1.0× 224 0.9× 115 0.5× 388 1.9× 253 1.6× 54 1.2k
Paul Chaikin 342 0.7× 484 1.9× 355 1.5× 101 0.5× 117 0.7× 13 913
Philippe Peyla 325 0.7× 525 2.0× 394 1.7× 144 0.7× 103 0.6× 50 1.1k
T. Honda 307 0.6× 250 1.0× 229 1.0× 61 0.3× 185 1.2× 88 934
Thomas Bickel 280 0.6× 317 1.2× 353 1.5× 188 0.9× 96 0.6× 40 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan C. Keim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan C. Keim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan C. Keim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan C. Keim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan C. Keim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan C. Keim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan C. Keim. The network helps show where Nathan C. Keim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan C. Keim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan C. Keim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan C. Keim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan C. Keim. Nathan C. Keim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026