Nathan Bradford
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Benjamin W. Van VoorheesJoshua FogelBlake FaganRocco DomanicoTracy R. G. GladstoneCarl C. BellMark A. ReineckeNatalie Watson
- Topics
- Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTranslational researchCommunity Mental Health Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippines
In The Last Decade
Nathan Bradford
7 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Clinical Psychology 131
- Applied Psychology 112
- General Health Professions 57
- Sociology and Political Science 53
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 36
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Bradford
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Bradford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Bradford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Bradford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Bradford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Bradford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Bradford. The network helps show where Nathan Bradford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Bradford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Bradford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Bradford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Bradford. Nathan Bradford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | When A system of child protection becomes abusive--Case report: bilateral linear parietal skull fractures in an infant from accidental occipital trauma. | 2 |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | Adolescent Dose and Ratings of an Internet-Based Depression Prevention Program: A Randomized Trial of Primary Care Physician Brief Advice versus a Motivational Interview. | 56 |
About Nathan Bradford
Nathan Bradford is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 7 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations) and Speech and Hearing (16 citations). Nathan Bradford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin W. Van Voorhees, Joshua Fogel, Blake Fagan, Rocco Domanico, Tracy R. G. Gladstone, Carl C. Bell, Mark A. Reinecke, Natalie Watson, Josien Schuurmans and S Zuckerman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Translational research and Community Mental Health Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.