Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

1.1k citations
40 papers · 571 indexed · h-index 13
Topics
Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (7 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers)
Partner nations
NetherlandsBelgiumGreece

In The Last Decade

Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

39 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Nathaly Rius Ottenheim
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Clinical Psychology 192
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 159
  • Physiology 120
  • Applied Psychology 108
  • Social Psychology 96
Replace Brad Partridge with:
Brad Partridge Australia
Jean-Philippe Gouin United States
Alex Woody United States
Michael B. Friedman United States
Kate Maston Australia
Bruno Messina Coimbra Brazil
Wilson S. Figueroa United States
Olivia Wynne Australia
Ekin Blackwell Canada
Xingjia Cui United States
Nathaly Rius Ottenheim relative to Brad Partridge Australia Brad Partridge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Brad Partridge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaly Rius Ottenheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaly Rius Ottenheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaly Rius Ottenheim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaly Rius Ottenheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaly Rius Ottenheim. The network helps show where Nathaly Rius Ottenheim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaly Rius Ottenheim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaly Rius Ottenheim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaly Rius Ottenheim. Nathaly Rius Ottenheim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 5
4 1
5 1
6 2
7 2
8 13
9 39
10 1
11 9
12 22
13 7
14 5
15 3
16 28
17 17
18 32
19 6
20 52

About Nathaly Rius Ottenheim

Nathaly Rius Ottenheim is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Aging and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (7 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (49 citations), Applied Psychology (108 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (159 citations). Nathaly Rius Ottenheim has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Erik J. Giltay, Daan Kromhout, Frans G. Zitman, Roos C. van der Mast, Johanna M. Geleijnse, Geja J. Hageman, Philip Spinhoven, Joyce M.J. Houben, Brenda W.J.H. Penninx and Ingrid V. E. Carlier. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026