Max de Leeuw

49 total papers · 550 total citations
24 papers, 372 citations indexed

About

Max de Leeuw is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Max de Leeuw has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 372 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Max de Leeuw's work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). Max de Leeuw is often cited by papers focused on Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers). Max de Leeuw collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Max de Leeuw's co-authors include Matthijs Vink, René S. Kahn, R.S. Kahn, Albert M. van Hemert, Nic J.A. van der Wee, Erik J. Giltay, Jurjen J. Luykx, M. A. Koenders, Iris Kleerekooper and Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Neuropsychopharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Max de Leeuw

23 papers receiving 369 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Max de Leeuw	204	134	70	67	66	24	372
Lindsay C. Hanford	179 0.9×	224 1.7×	71 1.0×	61 0.9×	63 1.0×	21	374
Prerona Mukherjee	225 1.1×	137 1.0×	40 0.6×	69 1.0×	79 1.2×	20	343
Cassandra Wannan	187 0.9×	188 1.4×	50 0.7×	89 1.3×	62 0.9×	28	366
Jeanette Lockovich	192 0.9×	183 1.4×	83 1.2×	68 1.0×	112 1.7×	18	431
Ashley K. Smith	228 1.1×	175 1.3×	93 1.3×	36 0.5×	68 1.0×	18	434
Maria Gloria Rossetti	171 0.8×	178 1.3×	56 0.8×	86 1.3×	83 1.3×	33	373
Carlos Portugal‐Nunes	141 0.7×	69 0.5×	41 0.6×	73 1.1×	67 1.0×	29	434
Linda A. Antonucci	174 0.9×	163 1.2×	70 1.0×	60 0.9×	78 1.2×	39	436
Valentina Ciullo	185 0.9×	131 1.0×	68 1.0×	42 0.6×	50 0.8×	19	357
Lynn Mørch‐Johnsen	208 1.0×	228 1.7×	45 0.6×	97 1.4×	56 0.8×	19	406

Countries citing papers authored by Max de Leeuw

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max de Leeuw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max de Leeuw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max de Leeuw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max de Leeuw

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max de Leeuw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max de Leeuw. The network helps show where Max de Leeuw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max de Leeuw

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max de Leeuw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max de Leeuw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Max de Leeuw. Max de Leeuw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact