Nathalie Vaes

707 total citations
19 papers, 400 citations indexed

About

Nathalie Vaes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathalie Vaes has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 400 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Nathalie Vaes's work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (5 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (4 papers) and Mechanisms of cancer metastasis (3 papers). Nathalie Vaes is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (5 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (4 papers) and Mechanisms of cancer metastasis (3 papers). Nathalie Vaes collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. Nathalie Vaes's co-authors include Veerle Melotte, Werend Boesmans, Christophe Lafosse, Alexander Koch, Maria M. Alves, G.M.S. Nys, Dimitri Hemelsoet, Kristine Oostra, Guy Vingerhoets and Keith A. Sharkey and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Free Radical Biology and Medicine and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Nathalie Vaes

19 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathalie Vaes Netherlands 13 126 89 85 51 48 19 400
Ingeborg Heirman Belgium 8 162 1.3× 52 0.6× 82 1.0× 77 1.5× 24 0.5× 10 499
Philippe Rizek Canada 10 100 0.8× 36 0.4× 35 0.4× 85 1.7× 20 0.4× 22 595
Fenye Liu China 12 107 0.8× 66 0.7× 20 0.2× 17 0.3× 27 0.6× 20 424
Yu-Fan Liu Taiwan 12 220 1.7× 20 0.2× 42 0.5× 34 0.7× 40 0.8× 20 513
Pamela Rosso Italy 13 191 1.5× 21 0.2× 26 0.3× 53 1.0× 21 0.4× 27 495
Christine V. Möser Germany 13 214 1.7× 28 0.3× 17 0.2× 45 0.9× 39 0.8× 25 503
Jiu‐Haw Yin Taiwan 12 97 0.8× 80 0.9× 22 0.3× 71 1.4× 17 0.4× 27 365
Jariya Umka United Kingdom 7 109 0.9× 42 0.5× 39 0.5× 16 0.3× 41 0.9× 12 469
Nathalie M. Malewicz Germany 11 208 1.7× 14 0.2× 51 0.6× 19 0.4× 53 1.1× 20 547

Countries citing papers authored by Nathalie Vaes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathalie Vaes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathalie Vaes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathalie Vaes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathalie Vaes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathalie Vaes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathalie Vaes. The network helps show where Nathalie Vaes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathalie Vaes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathalie Vaes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathalie Vaes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathalie Vaes. Nathalie Vaes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Vaes, Nathalie, et al.. (2023). Mini-review: Enteric glial cell heterogeneity: Is it all about the niche?. Neuroscience Letters. 812. 137396–137396. 6 indexed citations
2.
Vaes, Nathalie, et al.. (2022). Nerves in gastrointestinal cancer: from mechanism to modulations. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 19(12). 768–784. 35 indexed citations
3.
Koch, Alexander, Muriel X.G. Draht, Kristien Wouters, et al.. (2021). Identification of DNA methylation markers for early detection of CRC indicates a role for nervous system-related genes in CRC. Clinical Epigenetics. 13(1). 80–80. 25 indexed citations
4.
Vaes, Nathalie, et al.. (2021). The Emerging Role of Nerves and Glia in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers. 13(1). 152–152. 38 indexed citations
5.
Huygelier, Hanne, Brenda Schraepen, Christophe Lafosse, et al.. (2020). An immersive virtual reality game to train spatial attention orientation after stroke: A feasibility study. Applied Neuropsychology Adult. 29(5). 915–935. 41 indexed citations
6.
Vaes, Nathalie, Maureen J.B. Aarts, Joep G.H. van Roermund, et al.. (2019). Diagnostic DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. European Urology Oncology. 4(2). 215–226. 18 indexed citations
7.
Koch, Alexander, et al.. (2019). Nervous NDRGs: the N-myc downstream–regulated gene family in the central and peripheral nervous system. Neurogenetics. 20(4). 173–186. 37 indexed citations
8.
Vaes, Nathalie, Erwin Brosens, Alexander Koch, et al.. (2018). A combined literature and in silico analysis enlightens the role of the NDRG family in the gut. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 1862(10). 2140–2151. 12 indexed citations
9.
Vaes, Nathalie, Marjolein H.F.M. Lentjes, Marion J. Gijbels, et al.. (2017). NDRG 4, an early detection marker for colorectal cancer, is specifically expressed in enteric neurons. Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 29(9). 9 indexed citations
10.
Vaes, Nathalie, et al.. (2017). The role of enteric neurons in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer. 1868(2). 420–434. 33 indexed citations
11.
Criekinge, Tamaya Van, Wim Saeys, Ann Hallemans, et al.. (2017). Effectiveness of additional trunk exercises on gait performance: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 18(1). 249–249. 17 indexed citations
12.
Vaes, Nathalie, G.M.S. Nys, Christophe Lafosse, et al.. (2016). Rehabilitation of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation: effects of a mild treatment regime. A randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 28(6). 899–918. 26 indexed citations
13.
Walenbergh, Sofie M. A., Tom Houben, Tim Hendrikx, et al.. (2015). Weekly Treatment of 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin Improves Intracellular Cholesterol Levels in LDL Receptor Knockout Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 16(9). 21056–21069. 12 indexed citations
14.
Vaes, Nathalie, et al.. (2015). Contraversive neglect? A modulation of visuospatial neglect in association with contraversive pushing.. Neuropsychology. 29(6). 988–997. 2 indexed citations
15.
Vaes, Nathalie, Christophe Lafosse, G.M.S. Nys, et al.. (2014). Capturing peripersonal spatial neglect: An electronic method to quantify visuospatial processes. Behavior Research Methods. 47(1). 27–44. 17 indexed citations
16.
Vaes, Nathalie, Mitrajit Ghosh, Marc A. M. J. van Zandvoort, et al.. (2014). The flavonoid 7-mono-O-(β-hydroxyethyl)-rutoside is able to protect endothelial cells by a direct antioxidant effect. Toxicology in Vitro. 28(4). 538–543. 22 indexed citations
17.
Hendrikx, Tim, Veerle Bieghs, Sofie M. A. Walenbergh, et al.. (2013). Macrophage Specific Caspase-1/11 Deficiency Protects against Cholesterol Crystallization and Hepatic Inflammation in Hyperlipidemic Mice. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e78792–e78792. 30 indexed citations
18.
19.
Lafosse, Christophe, et al.. (2007). Dysfunction of right-hemisphere attentional networks in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 30(1). 42–52. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026