Natasha Lekes
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard KoestnerTheodore A. PowersFrédérick L. PhilippeMireille JoussemetJianqun FangNathalie HoulfortTim KasserMark A. Villacorta
- Topics
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers)Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Natasha Lekes
20 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Social Psychology 711
- Clinical Psychology 411
- Applied Psychology 393
- Sociology and Political Science 251
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 246
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Lekes
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Lekes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Lekes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Lekes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Lekes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Lekes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Lekes. The network helps show where Natasha Lekes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Lekes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Lekes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Lekes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Lekes. Natasha Lekes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 167 | |
| 12 | Career and Technical Education Pathway Programs, Academic Performance, and the Transition to College and Career. | 14 |
| 13 | Community College Noncredit Occupational Programming: A Study of State Policies and Funding. | 12 |
| 14 | 160 | |
| 15 | 86 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 366 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 49 | |
| 20 | 95 |
About Natasha Lekes
Natasha Lekes is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (393 citations), Social Psychology (711 citations) and Clinical Psychology (411 citations). Natasha Lekes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Richard Koestner, Theodore A. Powers, Frédérick L. Philippe, Mireille Joussemet, Jianqun Fang, Nathalie Houlfort, Tim Kasser, Mark A. Villacorta, Geneviève Beaulieu‐Pelletier and Serge Lecours. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.