Natasha K. Stout

6.9k citations
106 papers · 4.1k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 32

Natasha K. Stout

103 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Analysis of Breast Canc...892019202620212023100200300400

Peers

Natasha K. Stout
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Oncology 2.2k
  • Cancer Research 774
  • Health Informatics 44
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 706
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 788
Replace Caprice C. Greenberg with:
Caprice C. Greenberg United States
Amy Ming‐Fang Yen Taiwan
Euǵenio Paci Italy
Sudeep Gupta India
Frances C. Wright Canada
Marcy Winget United States
Claudia Schmoor Germany
Lawrence von Karsa France
Nicole M. Kuderer United States
Sarah J. Lord Australia
Natasha K. Stout relative to Caprice C. Greenberg United States Caprice C. Greenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.7×
Caprice C. Greenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha K. Stout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha K. Stout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha K. Stout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha K. Stout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha K. Stout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha K. Stout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha K. Stout. The network helps show where Natasha K. Stout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha K. Stout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha K. Stout Line = papers co-authored together Natasha K. Stout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20251
3 20241
4 20243
5 20230
6 20234
7 20234
8 20236
9 202211
10 20224
11 202162
12 202120
13 202110
14 2021100
15 20217
16 201557
17
Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
201529
18
Modelling mammography screening for breast cancer in the Canadian context: Modification and testing of a microsimulation model.
201510
19
Clinical outcomes of modelling mammography screening strategies.
201517
20 20121

About Natasha K. Stout

Natasha K. Stout is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 106 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (65 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (27 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (26 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (23 papers), AI in cancer detection (11 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (10 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (10 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (2.2k citations), Cancer Research (774 citations) and Health Informatics (44 citations). Natasha K. Stout has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Oğuzhan Alagöz, Amy Trentham‐Dietz, Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Anna N.A. Tosteson, Diana L. Miglioretti, Brian L. Sprague, Karla Kerlikowske, Dennis G. Fryback, Harry J. de Koning and Sylvia K. Plevritis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026