Amy Trentham‐Dietz
- Oncology top 0.2%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 118
- Cancer Risks and Factors 107
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 40
- Cancer survivorship and care 28
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 51
- Genetics top 1%
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 26
- Estrogen and related hormone effects 24
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
-
- Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging 14
- Co-authors
- Polly A. NewcombJohn M. HamptonBrian L. SpragueLinda Titus‐ErnstoffPatrick RemingtonWalter C. WillettKathleen M. EganJohn A. Baron
- Cited by
- OncologyCancer ResearchGenetics
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)JAMA (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Amy Trentham‐Dietz
262 papers receiving 9.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Oncology 6.1k
- Cancer Research 1.9k
- Genetics 1.6k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 392
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 850
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Trentham‐Dietz
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Trentham‐Dietz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Trentham‐Dietz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Trentham‐Dietz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Trentham‐Dietz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Trentham‐Dietz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Trentham‐Dietz. The network helps show where Amy Trentham‐Dietz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Trentham‐Dietz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 62 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 100 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 57 | |
| 13 | Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies. | 2015 | 29 |
| 14 | Modelling mammography screening for breast cancer in the Canadian context: Modification and testing of a microsimulation model. | 2015 | 10 |
| 15 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 146 |
About Amy Trentham‐Dietz
Amy Trentham‐Dietz is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Genetics, having authored 271 papers that have together received 10.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (118 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (107 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (51 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (40 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (28 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (26 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (24 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (6.1k citations), Cancer Research (1.9k citations) and Genetics (1.6k citations). Amy Trentham‐Dietz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Polly A. Newcomb, John M. Hampton, Brian L. Sprague, Linda Titus‐Ernstoff, Patrick Remington, Walter C. Willett, Kathleen M. Egan, Kathleen M. Egan, John A. Baron and Ronald E. Gangnon. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and JAMA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.