Natalie Thomas

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Natalie Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 118
  • Biological Psychiatry 63
  • Microbiology 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 176
  • Clinical Psychology 222
Replace Haroon Sheikh with:
Haroon Sheikh Canada
Indrani Halder United States
W.M.A. Verhoeven Netherlands
Nick Wainwright United Kingdom
Lynne M. Smith United States
Annemiek Dols Netherlands
Adel Wassef United States
Gita A. Pathak United States
Anne Masi Australia
Ying Jiang China
Natalie Thomas relative to Haroon Sheikh Canada Haroon Sheikh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Haroon Sheikh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Thomas. The network helps show where Natalie Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019185
2 2020154
3 201891
4 202085
5 201779
6 201641
7 202235
8 202033
9 202033
10 201831
11 201829
12 201826
13 201923
14 201823
15 201520
16 201020
17 202218
18 202118
19 202117
20 201816

About Natalie Thomas

Natalie Thomas is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (13 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (11 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (4 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (118 citations), Biological Psychiatry (63 citations), Microbiology (109 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (176 citations) and Clinical Psychology (222 citations). Natalie Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Gurvich, Jayashri Kulkarni, Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib, Dana M. Chase, Denise J. Roe, Melissa M. Herbst‐Kralovetz, Zehra Esra Ilhan, Paweł Łaniewski, Roisin Worsley and Kate E. Hoy. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, Biological Psychiatry, International Journal of Social Psychiatry and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact