Natalie Strand

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
62 papers, 869 citations indexed

About

Natalie Strand is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Strand has authored 62 papers receiving a total of 869 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Pharmacology, 15 papers in Physiology and 14 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Natalie Strand's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (23 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers). Natalie Strand is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (23 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (12 papers). Natalie Strand collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Natalie Strand's co-authors include Ryan S. D’Souza, Jillian Maloney, Christopher Wie, Samer Narouze, John A. Freeman, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R. Deer, Kathryn Curtis, Jessica Wegener and David Provenzano and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurosurgery and Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Strand

59 papers receiving 853 citations

Hit Papers

Caring for patients with pain during the COVID ‐19 pandem... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Strand United States 15 296 224 191 176 132 62 869
Scott Choi United States 9 431 1.5× 101 0.5× 173 0.9× 74 0.4× 115 0.9× 18 1.1k
Chao Hsing Yeh United States 20 295 1.0× 105 0.5× 132 0.7× 144 0.8× 37 0.3× 59 1.1k
Felipe José Jandre dos Reis Brazil 20 604 2.0× 64 0.3× 134 0.7× 148 0.8× 77 0.6× 115 1.1k
Jeremiah Trudeau United States 15 261 0.9× 157 0.7× 86 0.5× 245 1.4× 42 0.3× 42 875
Daniel Brookoff United States 20 221 0.7× 243 1.1× 89 0.5× 181 1.0× 41 0.3× 34 1.1k
Lilian Hoffecker United States 13 124 0.4× 161 0.7× 115 0.6× 37 0.2× 68 0.5× 34 761
Tracy Jackson United Kingdom 15 252 0.9× 95 0.4× 56 0.3× 218 1.2× 34 0.3× 53 1.1k
Desiree R. Azizoddin United States 17 98 0.3× 99 0.4× 45 0.2× 46 0.3× 55 0.4× 50 630
Anava Wren United States 18 164 0.6× 76 0.3× 93 0.5× 66 0.4× 47 0.4× 37 1.1k
Kathleen A. Griffith United States 17 99 0.3× 54 0.2× 62 0.3× 179 1.0× 54 0.4× 37 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Strand

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Strand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Strand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Strand more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Strand

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Strand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Strand. The network helps show where Natalie Strand may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Strand

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Strand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Strand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Strand. Natalie Strand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Strand, Natalie, et al.. (2025). Cannabinoids in Chronic Pain Management: A Review of the History, Efficacy, Applications, and Risks. Biomedicines. 13(3). 530–530. 4 indexed citations
2.
Strand, Natalie, Elizabeth L. Kacel, Eleshia J. P. Morrison, et al.. (2024). Concepts and Approaches in the Management of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 99(7). 1114–1126.
3.
Sayed, Dawood, Timothy R. Deer, Vinicius Tieppo Francio, et al.. (2024). American Society of Pain and Neuroscience Best Practice (ASPN) Guideline for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Disorders. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 17. 1601–1638. 4 indexed citations
4.
Strand, Natalie, et al.. (2024). Pain during menopause. Maturitas. 191. 108135–108135. 5 indexed citations
5.
Freeman, John A., et al.. (2024). The Role of Orthoses in Chronic Axial Spinal Conditions. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 28(6). 501–506. 5 indexed citations
6.
Sayed, Dawood, Natalie Strand, Alaa Abd‐Elsayed, et al.. (2023). The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Guidelines for Radiofrequency Ablative Procedures in Patients with Implanted Devices. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 16. 3693–3706. 4 indexed citations
7.
Strand, Natalie, Ryan S. D’Souza, Jay Karri, et al.. (2023). Medical Cannabis: A Review from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 16. 4217–4228. 7 indexed citations
8.
Strand, Natalie, et al.. (2023). Cannabis for the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines. 11(6). 1621–1621. 14 indexed citations
9.
Maloney, Jillian, et al.. (2023). Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Review. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 28(4). 239–249. 5 indexed citations
10.
Maloney, Jillian, et al.. (2023). Job Satisfaction Among Pain Medicine Physicians in the US. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 16. 1867–1876. 2 indexed citations
11.
Francio, Vinicius Tieppo, et al.. (2023). Accessibility and Ease of Use in Neuromodulation Devices. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 27(3). 584–588. 3 indexed citations
12.
Kraus, Molly B., et al.. (2023). Parental Leave Policies in the Top 20 US Hospitals: A Call for Inclusivity and Improvement. Women s Health Reports. 4(1). 162–168. 2 indexed citations
13.
Harbell, Monica W., et al.. (2023). Addressing Bias in Acute Postoperative Pain Management. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 27(9). 407–415. 2 indexed citations
14.
Peck, Jacquelin, Megha Patel, Elyse M. Cornett, et al.. (2023). Review of Interventional Therapies for Refractory Pediatric   Migraine. Health psychology research. 10(5). 1–1. 2 indexed citations
16.
Desai, Mehul J., Jonathan M. Hagedorn, Natalie Strand, et al.. (2022). Social Media and Professional Conduct (SMART): Best Practice Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). Journal of Pain Research. Volume 15. 1669–1678. 8 indexed citations
17.
Deer, Timothy R., Jay S. Grider, Jason E. Pope, et al.. (2022). Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). Journal of Pain Research. Volume 15. 1325–1354. 12 indexed citations
18.
Wie, Christopher, et al.. (2022). Interventional Treatment Modalities for Chronic Abdominal and Pelvic Visceral Pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports. 26(9). 683–691. 11 indexed citations
19.
Kraus, Molly B., Jillian Maloney, Skye Buckner‐Petty, et al.. (2021). Parental leave policy information during residency interviews. BMC Medical Education. 21(1). 623–623. 12 indexed citations
20.
Chakravarthy, Krishnan, Natalie Strand, Anne Frosch, et al.. (2021). Recommendations and Guidance for Steroid Injection Therapy and COVID-19 Vaccine Administration from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). Journal of Pain Research. Volume 14. 623–629. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026