Keith Scarfo

453 total citations
9 papers, 271 citations indexed

About

Keith Scarfo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Scarfo has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 271 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Recurrent topics in Keith Scarfo's work include RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). Keith Scarfo is often cited by papers focused on RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). Keith Scarfo collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Keith Scarfo's co-authors include James G. Hecker, Shaomin Zou, Michael H. Nantz, Laura Thompson, David W. Lee, M. Jung, Krishnan Chakravarthy, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R. Deer and Natalie Strand and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Neurology and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

In The Last Decade

Keith Scarfo

9 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Keith Scarfo United States 7 142 58 43 37 28 9 271
Caryl Schwartzbach United States 9 272 1.9× 74 1.3× 19 0.4× 40 1.1× 22 0.8× 11 436
W. Bryan Burnette United States 10 194 1.4× 24 0.4× 27 0.6× 21 0.6× 9 0.3× 25 417
Justin D. Wagner Canada 7 262 1.8× 68 1.2× 39 0.9× 41 1.1× 6 0.2× 8 461
Veronica McInerney Ireland 6 116 0.8× 42 0.7× 31 0.7× 21 0.6× 3 0.1× 27 214
M. Al-Lozi United States 6 175 1.2× 42 0.7× 28 0.7× 40 1.1× 2 0.1× 10 361
Yusuke Yamauchi Japan 10 66 0.5× 11 0.2× 49 1.1× 23 0.6× 4 0.1× 25 308
Monique David Australia 10 122 0.9× 10 0.2× 15 0.3× 106 2.9× 13 0.5× 18 360
Martha Zeeman United States 6 109 0.8× 11 0.2× 28 0.7× 86 2.3× 93 3.3× 14 331
Jamie McPherson United Kingdom 6 275 1.9× 23 0.4× 75 1.7× 93 2.5× 24 0.9× 9 503

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Scarfo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Scarfo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Scarfo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Scarfo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Scarfo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Scarfo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Scarfo. The network helps show where Keith Scarfo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Scarfo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Scarfo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Scarfo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Scarfo. Keith Scarfo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Deer, Timothy R., Edward Tavel, Sayed Wahezi, et al.. (2024). Comparing Conventional Medical Management to Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Low Back Pain in a Cohort of DISTINCT RCT Patients. Journal of Pain Research. Volume 17. 2741–2752. 2 indexed citations
2.
Scarfo, Keith, et al.. (2023). ID: 220996 Use of Remote Physiological Monitoring to Track Patient Well-Being During the SCS Trial. Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface. 26(4). S1–S1. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lee, David W., M. Jung, Jonathan M. Hagedorn, et al.. (2021). Latest Evidence-Based Application for Radiofrequency Neurotomy (LEARN): Best Practice Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN). Journal of Pain Research. Volume 14. 2807–2831. 36 indexed citations
4.
Edhi, Muhammad Muzzammil, Suguru Koyama, Satoru Yoshikawa, et al.. (2020). Pain phenotypes classified by machine learning using electroencephalography features. NeuroImage. 223. 117256–117256. 35 indexed citations
5.
Zou, Shaomin, Keith Scarfo, Michael H. Nantz, & James G. Hecker. (2010). Lipid-mediated delivery of RNA is more efficient than delivery of DNA in non-dividing cells. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 389(1-2). 232–243. 124 indexed citations
6.
Zou, Shaomin, et al.. (2008). Whole Animal In Vivo Imaging After Transient, Nonviral Gene delivery to the Rat Central Nervous System. Molecular Therapy. 16(11). 1857–1864. 16 indexed citations
7.
Hecker, James G., et al.. (2008). A Flexible Method for the Conjugation of Aminooxy Ligands to Preformed Complexes of Nucleic Acids and Lipids. ChemMedChem. 3(9). 1356–1361. 6 indexed citations
8.
Scarfo, Keith, et al.. (2008). Capnography monitoring enhances safety of postoperative patient-controlled analgesia.. PubMed. 1(5). 28–35. 37 indexed citations
9.
Cummins, T.R., Muthukrishnan Renganathan, Peter K. Stys, et al.. (2003). The pentapeptide QYNAD does not block voltage-gated sodium channels. Neurology. 60(2). 224–229. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026