Natalie Riblet

2.1k citations
68 papers · 869 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Riblet

62 papers receiving 847 citations

Peers

Natalie Riblet
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Clinical Psychology 303
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 67
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 182
  • Social Psychology 157
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 180
Replace Ewa Sucha with:
Ewa Sucha Canada
Nehama Goldberger Israel
Shannon Ruff Dirksen United States
Nand K. Wadhwa United States
Sara Campagna Italy
Yves Charpak France
Catherine Martin Australia
R Sturm United States
Erin Kelty Australia
Susan Frisbee‐Hume United States
Natalie Riblet relative to Ewa Sucha Canada Ewa Sucha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Ewa Sucha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Riblet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Riblet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Riblet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Riblet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Riblet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Riblet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Riblet. The network helps show where Natalie Riblet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Riblet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Riblet Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Riblet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018132
2 201790
3 201755
4 201836
5 201535
6 201932
7 201932
8 202028
9 201828
10 201427
11 201724
12 201923
13 202220
14 201918
15 202016
16 201914
17 201812
18 201811
19 202211
20 201411

About Natalie Riblet

Natalie Riblet is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 869 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (25 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (16 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (303 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (67 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (182 citations), Social Psychology (157 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (180 citations). Natalie Riblet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bradley V. Watts, Brian Shiner, Yinong Young‐Xu, Alison Volpe Holmes, Kathryn Dee L. MacMillan, Daniel J. Gottlieb, Peter D. Mills, Talya Peltzman, Philip P. Goodney and Jesse A. Columbo. Their work appears in journals such as General Hospital Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psychiatric Services, BJPsych Open and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact