Natalie R. Powers

23 total papers · 819 total citations
18 papers, 489 citations indexed

About

Natalie R. Powers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie R. Powers has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 489 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie R. Powers's work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). Natalie R. Powers is often cited by papers focused on Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). Natalie R. Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Natalie R. Powers's co-authors include Petko M. Petkov, Michael Walker, Jeffrey R. Gruen, Kenneth Paigen, Christopher L. Baker, Emil D. Parvanov, John D. Eicher, Laura L. Miller, Susan M. Ring and Shashwath A. Meda and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie R. Powers

18 papers receiving 486 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie R. Powers 261 173 154 72 50 18 489
Yu Wang 102 0.4× 221 1.3× 176 1.1× 77 1.1× 84 1.7× 14 404
Jillian M. Couto 243 0.9× 181 1.0× 176 1.1× 59 0.8× 50 1.0× 21 539
Andrea Citterio 165 0.6× 62 0.4× 54 0.4× 27 0.4× 20 0.4× 26 477
Nuala H. Simpson 159 0.6× 192 1.1× 279 1.8× 151 2.1× 25 0.5× 12 471
Sophia Docherty 175 0.7× 57 0.3× 197 1.3× 76 1.1× 38 0.8× 14 453
Lissette Gomez 263 1.0× 68 0.4× 156 1.0× 41 0.6× 15 0.3× 36 524
Darina Roeske 112 0.4× 133 0.8× 138 0.9× 72 1.0× 50 1.0× 11 478
Heidi Anthoni 118 0.5× 320 1.8× 247 1.6× 89 1.2× 104 2.1× 7 441
William M. Brandler 103 0.4× 139 0.8× 233 1.5× 304 4.2× 22 0.4× 8 494
Daniela Mayer 196 0.8× 142 0.8× 98 0.6× 20 0.3× 19 0.4× 17 484

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie R. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie R. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie R. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie R. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie R. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie R. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie R. Powers. The network helps show where Natalie R. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie R. Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie R. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie R. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie R. Powers. Natalie R. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026