Natalie R. Powers

825 total citations
18 papers, 492 citations indexed

About

Natalie R. Powers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie R. Powers has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 492 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie R. Powers's work include Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). Natalie R. Powers is often cited by papers focused on Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (6 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). Natalie R. Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Natalie R. Powers's co-authors include Petko M. Petkov, Michael Walker, Jeffrey R. Gruen, Kenneth Paigen, Christopher L. Baker, Emil D. Parvanov, John D. Eicher, Susan M. Ring, Laura L. Miller and Godfrey D. Pearlson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie R. Powers

18 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Natalie R. Powers

DEP

GENET

Nallur B. Ramachandra India

Caroline Phillips United Kingdom

Nuala H. Simpson United Kingdom

Nadine Kluck Germany

Heidi Anthoni Sweden

William M. Brandler United Kingdom

John Tan United States

Andrea Coates United Kingdom

Haiying Meng United States

Riccardo Alessandrelli Italy

Nallur B. Ramachandra India

Natalie R. Powers

223 ×0.8

89 ×0.5

DEP

254 ×1.6

GENET

56 ×0.8

22 ×0.4

Citations per year, relative to Natalie R. Powers Natalie R. Powers (= 1×) peers Nallur B. Ramachandra

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie R. Powers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie R. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie R. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie R. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie R. Powers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie R. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie R. Powers. The network helps show where Natalie R. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie R. Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie R. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie R. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie R. Powers. Natalie R. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Powers, Natalie R., Timothy Billings, Kenneth Paigen, & Petko M. Petkov. (2021). Differential effects of two catalytic mutations on full-length PRDM9 and its isolated PR/SET domain reveal a case of pseudomodularity. Genetics. 219(4). 1 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Tanmoy, Michael Walker, Natalie R. Powers, et al.. (2021). Prdm9 and meiotic cohesin proteins cooperatively promote DNA double-strand break formation in mammalian spermatocytes. Current Biology. 31(6). 1351–1351. 1 indexed citations

Powers, Natalie R., Beth L. Dumont, Chihiro Emori, et al.. (2020). Sexual dimorphism in the meiotic requirement for PRDM9: A mammalian evolutionary safeguard. Science Advances. 6(43). 13 indexed citations

Bhattacharyya, Tanmoy, Michael Walker, Natalie R. Powers, et al.. (2019). Prdm9 and Meiotic Cohesin Proteins Cooperatively Promote DNA Double-Strand Break Formation in Mammalian Spermatocytes. Current Biology. 29(6). 1002–1018.e7. 30 indexed citations

Tang, Kevin, Jeffrey G. Malins, Natalie R. Powers, et al.. (2018). Worldwide distribution of theDCDC2READ1 regulatory element and its relationship with phoneme variation across languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(19). 4951–4956. 8 indexed citations

Baker, Christopher L., Michael Walker, Seda Arat, et al.. (2018). Tissue-Specific Trans Regulation of the Mouse Epigenome. Genetics. 211(3). 831–845. 10 indexed citations

Powers, Natalie R., Emil D. Parvanov, Christopher L. Baker, et al.. (2016). The Meiotic Recombination Activator PRDM9 Trimethylates Both H3K36 and H3K4 at Recombination Hotspots In Vivo. PLoS Genetics. 12(6). e1006146–e1006146. 128 indexed citations

Powers, Natalie R. & Meredith W. Kier. (2016). Meeting Diverse Needs Through Scientific Fluency: A synthesis of research-based recommendations that promote scientific literacy for all students. 1 indexed citations

Walker, Michael, Timothy Billings, Christopher L. Baker, et al.. (2015). Affinity-seq detects genome-wide PRDM9 binding sites and reveals the impact of prior chromatin modifications on mammalian recombination hotspot usage. Epigenetics & Chromatin. 8(1). 31–31. 55 indexed citations

10.

Powers, Natalie R., John D. Eicher, Laura L. Miller, et al.. (2015). The regulatory element READ1 epistatically influences reading and language, with both deleterious and protective alleles. Journal of Medical Genetics. 53(3). 163–171. 24 indexed citations

11.

Eicher, John D., Catherine M. Stein, Allison Avrich Ciesla, et al.. (2015). The DYX2 locus and neurochemical signaling genes contribute to speech sound disorder and related neurocognitive domains. Genes Brain & Behavior. 14(4). 377–385. 8 indexed citations

12.

Eicher, John D., Natalie R. Powers, Laura L. Miller, et al.. (2014). Characterization of the DYX2 locus on chromosome 6p22 with reading disability, language impairment, and IQ. Human Genetics. 133(7). 869–881. 29 indexed citations

13.

Powers, Natalie R., John D. Eicher, Falk Butter, et al.. (2014). Alleles of a Polymorphic ETV6 Binding Site in DCDC2 Confer Risk of Reading and Language Impairment. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 94(5). 798–798. 2 indexed citations

14.

Powers, Natalie R., John D. Eicher, Falk Butter, et al.. (2013). Alleles of a Polymorphic ETV6 Binding Site in DCDC2 Confer Risk of Reading and Language Impairment. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 93(1). 19–28. 53 indexed citations

15.

Eicher, John D., Natalie R. Powers, Kelly Cho, et al.. (2013). Associations of Prenatal Nicotine Exposure and the Dopamine Related Genes ANKK1 and DRD2 to Verbal Language. PLoS ONE. 8(5). e63762–e63762. 20 indexed citations

16.

Jamadar, Sharna D., Natalie R. Powers, Shashwath A. Meda, et al.. (2012). Genetic influences of resting state fMRI activity in language-related brain regions in healthy controls and schizophrenia patients: a pilot study. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 7(1). 15–27. 21 indexed citations

17.

Jamadar, Sharna D., Natalie R. Powers, Shashwath A. Meda, et al.. (2011). Genetic influences of cortical gray matter in language-related regions in healthy controls and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research. 129(2-3). 141–148. 42 indexed citations

18.

Meng, Haiying, Natalie R. Powers, Ling Tang, et al.. (2010). A Dyslexia-Associated Variant in DCDC2 Changes Gene Expression. Behavior Genetics. 41(1). 58–66. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact