Natalie Le Sage
- Emergency Medicine top 0.5%
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 31
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 20
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 16
- Surgery top 5%
- Trauma Management and Diagnosis 12
- Abdominal Trauma and Injuries 8
- Neurology top 5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 14
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 16
-
- Injury Epidemiology and Prevention 5
- Co-authors
- Lynne MooreMarcel ÉmondMoïshe LibermanAndré LavoieJohn S. SampalisA LavoieÉric BergeronBelkacem Abdous
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (3 papers)Pain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Le Sage
72 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Emergency Medicine 1.0k
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 130
- Surgery 639
- Neurology 212
- Epidemiology 369
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Le Sage
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Le Sage's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Le Sage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Le Sage more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Le Sage
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Le Sage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Le Sage. The network helps show where Natalie Le Sage may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Le Sage, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 44 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 173 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 28 |
About Natalie Le Sage
Natalie Le Sage is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Neurology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (31 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (20 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (16 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (16 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (14 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (12 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (8 papers) and Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (1.0k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (130 citations) and Surgery (639 citations). Natalie Le Sage has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynne Moore, Marcel Émond, Moïshe Liberman, André Lavoie, John S. Sampalis, A Lavoie, Éric Bergeron, Belkacem Abdous, Éric Mercier and Alexis F. Turgeon. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.