Natalie L. Cleavitt
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Co-authors
- Timothy J. FaheyJohn J. BattlesCharles T. DriscollBrent D. MishlerM. C. F. ProctorAndrew J. WoodPeter AlpertLloyd R. Stark
- Topics
- Lichen and fungal ecology (17 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (17 papers)Bryophyte Studies and Records (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natalie L. Cleavitt
45 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 697
- Ecology 597
- Plant Science 504
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 404
- Global and Planetary Change 337
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie L. Cleavitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie L. Cleavitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie L. Cleavitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie L. Cleavitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie L. Cleavitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie L. Cleavitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie L. Cleavitt. The network helps show where Natalie L. Cleavitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie L. Cleavitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie L. Cleavitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie L. Cleavitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie L. Cleavitt. Natalie L. Cleavitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 34 | |
| 17 | 113 | |
| 18 | 402 | |
| 19 | 205 | |
| 20 | 153 |
About Natalie L. Cleavitt
Natalie L. Cleavitt is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (17 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (17 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (697 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (404 citations) and Soil Science (236 citations). Natalie L. Cleavitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Fahey, John J. Battles, Charles T. Driscoll, Brent D. Mishler, M. C. F. Proctor, Andrew J. Wood, Peter Alpert, Lloyd R. Stark, Melvin J. Oliver and Peter M. Groffman. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Ecology Letters and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.