Mark Schulze
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Forestry top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Mark A. CochraneEdson VidalJames GroganDaniel C. NepstadPaul A. LefebvreAne AlencarCarlos SouzaEric A. Davidson
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (21 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers)Forest Management and Policy (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark Schulze
50 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Global and Planetary Change 2.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
- Ecology 908
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 425
- Forestry 340
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schulze
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schulze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schulze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schulze more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schulze
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schulze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schulze. The network helps show where Mark Schulze may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Schulze
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Schulze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Schulze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Schulze. Mark Schulze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 106 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 249 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | Positive Feedbacks in the Fire Dynamic of Closed Canopy Tropical Forestsbreakdown → | 698 |
| 20 | Diet and Hunting Behavior of the Plumbeous Kite | 6 |
About Mark Schulze
Mark Schulze is a scholar working on Forestry, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (21 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.0k citations) and Forestry (340 citations). Mark Schulze has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Cochrane, Edson Vidal, James Grogan, Daniel C. Nepstad, Paul A. Lefebvre, Ane Alencar, Carlos Souza, Eric A. Davidson, David F. Whitacre and Nathaniel E. Seavy. Their work appears in journals such as Science, New Phytologist and Global Change Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.