M. C. F. Proctor

10.5k citations
114 papers · 7.8k indexed · 3 hit papers · h-index 40
Topics
Bryophyte Studies and Records (46 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (42 papers)Lichen and fungal ecology (40 papers)

In The Last Decade

M. C. F. Proctor

110 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Hit Papers

Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzuge der Vegetationskunde.19672026198620061967200019722505007501000

Peers

M. C. F. Proctor
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.9k
  • Plant Science 3.9k
  • Ecology 2.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 730
Replace Rune Halvorsen Økland with:
Rune Halvorsen Økland Norway
B. R. Trenbath Australia
Michal Hájek Czechia
Peter Alpert United States
Roy Turkington Canada
Eddy van der Maarel Sweden
M. J. A. Werger Netherlands
L. C. Bliss United States
Malcolm C. Press United Kingdom
Mary T. K. Arroyo Chile
M. C. F. Proctor relative to Rune Halvorsen Økland Norway Rune Halvorsen Økland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Rune Halvorsen Økland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. F. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. F. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. F. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. F. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. F. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. F. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. F. Proctor. The network helps show where M. C. F. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. F. Proctor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. F. Proctor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. F. Proctor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. F. Proctor. M. C. F. Proctor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 35
2 137
3
Some new British and Irish Sorbus L. taxa (Rosaceae)
11
4 2
5 37
6 16
7 133
8 226
9 51
10
MALHAM TARN MOSS: THE SURFACE-WATER CHEMISTRY OF AN OMBROTROPHIC BOG
21
11 316
12 49
13 64
14 129
15 40
16 10
17 33
18 6
19 8
20 5

About M. C. F. Proctor

M. C. F. Proctor is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Ecology, having authored 114 papers that have together received 7.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bryophyte Studies and Records (46 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (42 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (40 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.9k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations) and Plant Science (3.9k citations). M. C. F. Proctor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include P. F. Yeo, Zoltán Tuba, B. D. Wheeler, A. J. C. Malloch, C. D. Pigott, H. J. B. Birks, D. A. Ratcliffe, Mariann Marschall, Nicholas Smirnoff and Zsolt Csintalan. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Ecology and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026