Natalie Kwai

53 total papers · 844 total citations
43 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

Natalie Kwai is a scholar working on Neurology, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Kwai has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Neurology, 24 papers in Physiology and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Natalie Kwai's work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (24 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (17 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers). Natalie Kwai is often cited by papers focused on Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (24 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (17 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers). Natalie Kwai collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Saudi Arabia. Natalie Kwai's co-authors include Arun V. Krishnan, Ann M. Poynten, Ria Arnold, Tushar Issar, Matthew C. Kiernan, Maria Markoulli, Cindy Lin, Shyam Sunder Tummanapalli, Mark Willcox and Kerry–Lee Milner and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Diabetes Care and Diabetes.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Kwai

43 papers receiving 634 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natalie Kwai 242 224 185 134 125 43 639
Hoda Gad 220 0.9× 117 0.5× 201 1.1× 101 0.8× 137 1.1× 49 668
Nigel Soper 150 0.6× 122 0.5× 169 0.9× 199 1.5× 38 0.3× 20 721
Sissel Løseth 337 1.4× 378 1.7× 35 0.2× 58 0.4× 60 0.5× 34 711
Panagiotis Kokotis 201 0.8× 390 1.7× 20 0.1× 70 0.5× 59 0.5× 64 744
Gidon J. Bönhof 382 1.6× 249 1.1× 28 0.2× 23 0.2× 169 1.4× 43 773
Thomas Julian 178 0.7× 236 1.1× 18 0.1× 35 0.3× 48 0.4× 25 633
Nasim Sheikh‐Bahaei 98 0.4× 244 1.1× 110 0.6× 180 1.3× 35 0.3× 43 769
Amro Stino 236 1.0× 254 1.1× 18 0.1× 48 0.4× 76 0.6× 37 616
Jun Saito 61 0.3× 38 0.2× 146 0.8× 122 0.9× 19 0.2× 32 656
Qian Wu 39 0.2× 131 0.6× 62 0.3× 139 1.0× 131 1.0× 64 731

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Kwai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Kwai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Kwai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Kwai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Kwai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Kwai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Kwai. The network helps show where Natalie Kwai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Kwai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Kwai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Kwai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Kwai. Natalie Kwai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026