Natalie Ann Hendry

499 total citations
22 papers, 320 citations indexed

About

Natalie Ann Hendry is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Ann Hendry has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 320 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Gender Studies and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Natalie Ann Hendry's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers). Natalie Ann Hendry is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers). Natalie Ann Hendry collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Natalie Ann Hendry's co-authors include Larissa Hjorth, Catherine Hartung, R. M. Welch, Kath Albury, Jacinthe Flore, Marina Carman, Graham Brown, Gary W. Dowsett, Jack Wallace and Jeanne Ellard and has published in prestigious journals such as The Sociological Review, Journal of the International AIDS Society and International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Ann Hendry

22 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Ann Hendry Australia 9 168 62 58 53 47 22 320
Siân Lincoln United Kingdom 11 292 1.7× 124 2.0× 118 2.0× 62 1.2× 56 1.2× 20 476
Kirk A. Johnson United States 11 174 1.0× 49 0.8× 50 0.9× 70 1.3× 46 1.0× 48 423
Elizabeth Taylor Quilliam United States 11 427 2.5× 60 1.0× 71 1.2× 63 1.2× 49 1.0× 18 632
Lindsay Palmer United States 12 118 0.7× 37 0.6× 106 1.8× 33 0.6× 37 0.8× 36 320
Mengfei Guan United States 10 225 1.3× 13 0.2× 68 1.2× 50 0.9× 43 0.9× 15 409
Sara Pluviano United Kingdom 9 233 1.4× 17 0.3× 37 0.6× 112 2.1× 27 0.6× 13 440
Wenxue Zou United States 10 193 1.1× 36 0.6× 78 1.3× 15 0.3× 46 1.0× 36 314
Mary K. Casey United States 8 132 0.8× 59 1.0× 88 1.5× 28 0.5× 26 0.6× 8 414
Janet Salmons Australia 6 171 1.0× 24 0.4× 40 0.7× 83 1.6× 45 1.0× 14 357
Cui Yan United States 2 180 1.1× 42 0.7× 93 1.6× 32 0.6× 23 0.5× 3 310

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ann Hendry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ann Hendry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ann Hendry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ann Hendry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ann Hendry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ann Hendry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ann Hendry. The network helps show where Natalie Ann Hendry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Ann Hendry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Ann Hendry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Ann Hendry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Ann Hendry. Natalie Ann Hendry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Robards, Brady, et al.. (2025). Guiding young people’s social media use in school policies: opportunities, risks, moral panics, and imagined futures. Journal of Youth Studies. 1–17. 5 indexed citations
2.
Hanckel, Benjamin & Natalie Ann Hendry. (2024). Young adults and investing for the future: Examining futuring practices and wellbeing through digital brokerage platforms. The Sociological Review. 73(3). 508–525. 3 indexed citations
3.
Hanckel, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). Young citizens in intersecting crises: Key debates in youth citizenship research. 6(3). 95–99. 4 indexed citations
4.
Hendry, Natalie Ann, et al.. (2022). Content analysis of responses to The Line, an Australian primary prevention of violence against women campaign on Facebook. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 33(S1). 340–348. 3 indexed citations
5.
Albury, Kath & Natalie Ann Hendry. (2022). Information, influence, ritual, participation: Defining digital sexual health. Journal of sociology. 59(3). 628–645. 9 indexed citations
6.
Flore, Jacinthe, et al.. (2022). Digital arts and culture in Australia: Promissory discourses and uncertain realities in pandemic times. Media International Australia. 192(1). 115–129. 2 indexed citations
7.
8.
Hartung, Catherine, et al.. (2022). Teachers of TikTok: Glimpses and gestures in the performance of professional identity. Media International Australia. 186(1). 81–96. 40 indexed citations
9.
Hendry, Natalie Ann, Catherine Hartung, & R. M. Welch. (2021). Health education, social media, and tensions of authenticity in the influencer pedagogy’ of health influencer Ashy Bines. Learning Media and Technology. 47(4). 427–439. 40 indexed citations
10.
Flore, Jacinthe, et al.. (2021). Creative arts workers during the Covid-19 pandemic: Social imaginaries in lockdown. Journal of sociology. 59(1). 197–214. 22 indexed citations
11.
Gomes, Catherine, et al.. (2021). Higher Degree Students (HDR) during COVID-19. Journal of International Students. 11(S2). 18 indexed citations
12.
Hendry, Natalie Ann. (2020). Young Women’s Mental Illness and (In-)visible Social Media Practices of Control and Emotional Recognition. Social Media + Society. 6(4). 16 indexed citations
13.
Hendry, Natalie Ann. (2020). New Ways of Seeing: Tumblr, Young People, and Mental Illness. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 315–325. 2 indexed citations
14.
Hendry, Natalie Ann, et al.. (2018). Untangling the conflation of ‘young adults’ and ‘young people’ in STI and sexual health policy and sex education. Sex Education. 18(5). 527–540. 6 indexed citations
15.
Hendry, Natalie Ann, Graham Brown, Gary W. Dowsett, & Marina Carman. (2017). Association between sexually transmissible infection testing, numbers of partners and talking to partners and friends about sexual health: survey of young adults. Sexual Health. 14(4). 378–382. 8 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Graham, Daniel Reeders, Gary W. Dowsett, et al.. (2015). Investigating combination HIV prevention: isolated interventions or complex system. Journal of the International AIDS Society. 18(1). 20499–20499. 28 indexed citations
17.
Hjorth, Larissa & Natalie Ann Hendry. (2015). A Snapshot of Social Media: Camera Phone Practices. Social Media + Society. 1(1). 98 indexed citations
18.
Hendry, Natalie Ann. (2015). Investigating young people’s sexual cultures. Culture Health & Sexuality. 17(6). 791–793. 5 indexed citations
19.
Hendry, Natalie Ann. (2014). Harry Potter and the Millennials: research methods and the politics of the Muggle generation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 17(6). 742–743. 3 indexed citations
20.
Hendry, Natalie Ann, et al.. (2013). Beyond high school : What do we know about young adults' social and sexual contexts? Literature Review.. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026