Natalie A. Prow

3.6k total citations
73 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Natalie A. Prow is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie A. Prow has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 60 papers in Infectious Diseases and 13 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Natalie A. Prow's work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (64 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (54 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (16 papers). Natalie A. Prow is often cited by papers focused on Mosquito-borne diseases and control (64 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (54 papers) and Malaria Research and Control (16 papers). Natalie A. Prow collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Japan. Natalie A. Prow's co-authors include Roy A. Hall, David N. Irani, Alexander A. Khromykh, Andreas Suhrbier, Jody Hobson‐Peters, Helle Bielefeldt‐Ohmann, Yin Xiang Setoh, Willy W. Suen, Joy Gardner and Judith H. Edmonds and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Natalie A. Prow

73 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Natalie A. Prow
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.8k
  • Infectious Diseases 1.7k
  • Insect Science 483
  • Immunology 359
  • Epidemiology 318
Replace James Weger‐Lucarelli with:
James Weger‐Lucarelli United States
Rosa María del Ángel Mexico
Tonya M. Colpitts United States
Shannan L. Rossi United States
Marie Flamand France
Chao Shan United States
October M. Sessions Singapore
Sukathida Ubol Thailand
Tian Wang United States
Juan E. Ludert Venezuela
James Weger‐Lucarelli United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natalie A. Prow
Natalie A. Prow · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natalie A. Prow
Natalie A. Prow · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie A. Prow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie A. Prow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie A. Prow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie A. Prow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie A. Prow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie A. Prow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie A. Prow. The network helps show where Natalie A. Prow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie A. Prow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie A. Prow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie A. Prow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie A. Prow. Natalie A. Prow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 14
3 30
4 17
5 61
6 64
7 6
8 17
9 35
10 9
11 21
12 10
13 90
14 7
15 33
16 24
17 17
18 188
19 133
20 31

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026