Natacha Kremer
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Fabrice VavreDelphine CharifMargaret McFall‐NgaiPatrick MavinguiEdward G. RubyAlexei A. MaklakovGöran ArnqvistDenis Voronin
- Topics
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (14 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNucleic Acids ResearchSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Natacha Kremer
26 papers receiving 990 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Insect Science 446
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 270
- Molecular Biology 216
- Genetics 210
- Ecology 153
Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Kremer
This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Kremer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Kremer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Kremer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Kremer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Kremer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Kremer. The network helps show where Natacha Kremer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natacha Kremer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natacha Kremer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natacha Kremer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natacha Kremer. Natacha Kremer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 107 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 78 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 147 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Natacha Kremer
Natacha Kremer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Endocrinology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (446 citations), Endocrinology (120 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (270 citations). Natacha Kremer has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Fabrice Vavre, Delphine Charif, Margaret McFall‐Ngai, Patrick Mavingui, Edward G. Ruby, Alexei A. Maklakov, Göran Arnqvist, Denis Voronin, Bertrand Mollereau and David Monnin. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.