Nastaran Dadashi
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 5%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Safety Research
- Co-authors
- David GolightlySarah SharplesAlex W. StedmonTony PridmoreJohn R. WilsonBrendan RyanLaura PickupTheresa Clarke
- Topics
- Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (15 papers)Occupational Health and Safety Research (15 papers)Safety Warnings and Signage (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaFinland
In The Last Decade
Nastaran Dadashi
30 papers receiving 273 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Social Psychology 117
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 72
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 31
- General Health Professions 28
- Safety Research 23
Countries citing papers authored by Nastaran Dadashi
This map shows the geographic impact of Nastaran Dadashi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nastaran Dadashi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nastaran Dadashi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nastaran Dadashi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nastaran Dadashi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nastaran Dadashi. The network helps show where Nastaran Dadashi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nastaran Dadashi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nastaran Dadashi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nastaran Dadashi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nastaran Dadashi. Nastaran Dadashi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | A socio-technical comparison of rail traffic control between GB and Sweden | 3 |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nastaran Dadashi
Nastaran Dadashi is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Social Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (15 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (15 papers) and Safety Warnings and Signage (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (72 citations), Social Psychology (117 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (8 citations). Nastaran Dadashi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include David Golightly, Sarah Sharples, Alex W. Stedmon, Tony Pridmore, John R. Wilson, Brendan Ryan, Laura Pickup, Theresa Clarke, Iris Epstein and Nazilla Khanlou. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Safety Science and Ergonomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.