Nasim Mostofi

11 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Nasim Mostofi
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 223
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 294
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
  • Physiology 152
Replace Diane L. Sorenson with:
Diane L. Sorenson United States
Antonio Fuschino Italy
Elizabeth M. Doncheck United States
Hikmayani Iskandar Indonesia
Bernd Strebel Germany
Rosemarie Krug Germany
Susana Feldman‐Naim United States
Rahul Pandit Netherlands
Michael Emond Canada
Preetam Lutchmansingh United States
Nasim Mostofi relative to Diane L. Sorenson United States Diane L. Sorenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Diane L. Sorenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nasim Mostofi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nasim Mostofi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nasim Mostofi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nasim Mostofi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nasim Mostofi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nasim Mostofi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nasim Mostofi. The network helps show where Nasim Mostofi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Nasim Mostofi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nasim Mostofi Line = papers co-authored together Nasim Mostofi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199795
2 198974
3 199964
4 199355
5 199549
6 199844
7 199740
8 199739
9 199628
10 199428
11 199612

About Nasim Mostofi

Nasim Mostofi is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, General Health Professions and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menstrual Health and Disorders (8 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (7 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (6 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper) and Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (223 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (294 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations) and Physiology (152 citations). Nasim Mostofi has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara L. Parry, J. Christian Gillin, Sarah L. Berga, Melville R. Klauber, J. Christian Gillin, Paul Clopton, Daniel F. Kripke, William Perry, Gail A. Laughlin and Shahrokh Golshan. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Biological Rhythms, Psychological Medicine and Biological Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact