Naomi Thompson
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Administration top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Pat CarlenHelen Odell‐MillerStephen PihlajaJ.A. HenryBenjamin R. UnderwoodEmma WolversonJörg FachnerDavid G. Whitten
- Topics
- Music Therapy and Health (7 papers)Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Naomi Thompson
22 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- General Health Professions 89
- Clinical Psychology 70
- Public Administration 45
- Social Psychology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Thompson
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Thompson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Thompson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Thompson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Thompson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Thompson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Thompson. The network helps show where Naomi Thompson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Thompson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Thompson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Thompson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Thompson. Naomi Thompson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Young Muslims and Exclusion - experiences of 'othering' | 2 |
| 16 | Deliberating the Environment: Scientists and the Socially Excluded in Dialogue | 2 |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | Substance abuse in nursing. Forming policies. | 3 |
| 19 | 127 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Naomi Thompson
Naomi Thompson is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Public Administration, having authored 23 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Therapy and Health (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (45 citations), General Health Professions (89 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations). Naomi Thompson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Pat Carlen, Helen Odell‐Miller, Stephen Pihlaja, J.A. Henry, Benjamin R. Underwood, Emma Wolverson, Jörg Fachner, David G. Whitten, Francesca Panin and Clemens Maidhof. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Frontiers in Psychiatry and BMC Geriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.