Stephen Pihlaja

416 total citations
29 papers, 132 citations indexed

About

Stephen Pihlaja is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Pihlaja has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 132 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Philosophy and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Stephen Pihlaja's work include Media, Religion, Digital Communication (8 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers). Stephen Pihlaja is often cited by papers focused on Media, Religion, Digital Communication (8 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (6 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (6 papers). Stephen Pihlaja collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and Malaysia. Stephen Pihlaja's co-authors include Naomi Thompson, Daniel Allington, P. D. Richardson and Makoto Watanabe and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Youth Studies, Narrative Inquiry and Applied Linguistics Review.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Pihlaja

26 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Stephen Pihlaja
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 55
  • Philosophy 31
  • Literature and Literary Theory 31
  • Communication 27
  • Language and Linguistics 26
Replace Marjut Johansson with:
Marjut Johansson Finland
Ingrid de Saint‐Georges Luxembourg
Marianna Patrona Greece
Gudrun Held Austria
Dalia Gavriely‐Nuri Israel
Ursula Lutzky Austria
Christoph Schubert Germany
Raúl Pérez United States
Muhammad A. Badarneh Jordan
Luke Fleming Canada
Marjut Johansson Finland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Stephen Pihlaja
Stephen Pihlaja · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Stephen Pihlaja
Stephen Pihlaja · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pihlaja

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pihlaja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pihlaja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pihlaja more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pihlaja

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pihlaja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pihlaja. The network helps show where Stephen Pihlaja may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Pihlaja

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Pihlaja. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Pihlaja based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Pihlaja. Stephen Pihlaja is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 5
4 5
5 1
6 8
7 3
8 8
9
‘Hey YouTube’: Positioning the Viewer in Vlogs
1
10 6
11 1
12 6
13
Young Muslims and Exclusion - experiences of 'othering'
2
14 12
15 9
16 5
17 9
18 0
19
The Pope of YouTube: Metaphor and misunderstanding in Atheist-Christian YouTube dialogue
1
20
“Would you like to dance with me, Miwa?”: gender roles and the EFL Text
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026