Naomi J. Freeman

984 total citations
22 papers, 585 citations indexed

About

Naomi J. Freeman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi J. Freeman has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 585 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 20 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Naomi J. Freeman's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (20 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers). Naomi J. Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (20 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (20 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (12 papers). Naomi J. Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Naomi J. Freeman's co-authors include Jeffrey C. Sandler, Kelly M. Socia, Michael C. Seto, Jill S. Levenson, Franca Cortoni, Yunmei Lu and Curt R. Bartol and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and Law and Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Naomi J. Freeman

20 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Naomi J. Freeman United States 11 501 473 152 100 22 22 585
Juanita N. Baker United States 7 488 1.0× 474 1.0× 107 0.7× 42 0.4× 15 0.7× 11 554
Eric S. Janus United States 11 317 0.6× 304 0.6× 56 0.4× 27 0.3× 13 0.6× 38 398
Kaitlin M. Boyle United States 11 94 0.2× 171 0.4× 194 1.3× 82 0.8× 42 1.9× 25 325
Suzanne Wallace‐Capretta Canada 8 349 0.7× 410 0.9× 27 0.2× 77 0.8× 12 0.5× 9 493
Shelley A. Price United Kingdom 6 180 0.4× 197 0.4× 147 1.0× 181 1.8× 87 4.0× 9 359
Matthew W. Brosi United States 8 164 0.3× 142 0.3× 181 1.2× 95 0.9× 51 2.3× 21 298
Kathleen C. Faller United States 8 289 0.6× 154 0.3× 88 0.6× 122 1.2× 42 1.9× 10 365
Robert E. Longo United States 6 391 0.8× 220 0.5× 95 0.6× 46 0.5× 17 0.8× 7 424
Mary de Young United States 7 172 0.3× 116 0.2× 61 0.4× 58 0.6× 24 1.1× 16 257
Nova Inkpen Australia 4 204 0.4× 280 0.6× 25 0.2× 35 0.3× 47 2.1× 5 331

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi J. Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi J. Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi J. Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi J. Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi J. Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi J. Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi J. Freeman. The network helps show where Naomi J. Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi J. Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi J. Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi J. Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi J. Freeman. Naomi J. Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Freeman, Naomi J., et al.. (2024). Reexamining predictors of trial outcomes in New York State’s sex offender civil management process.. Law and Human Behavior. 48(1). 67–82.
2.
Sandler, Jeffrey C. & Naomi J. Freeman. (2017). Evaluation of New York State's Sex Offender Civil Management Assessment Process Recidivism Outcomes. Criminology & Public Policy. 16(3). 913–936. 5 indexed citations
3.
Lu, Yunmei, Naomi J. Freeman, & Jeffrey C. Sandler. (2015). Predictors of the sex offender civil commitment trial outcomes in New York State.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(5). 514–524. 8 indexed citations
4.
Seto, Michael C., Jeffrey C. Sandler, & Naomi J. Freeman. (2015). The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests: Predictive and Concurrent Validity. Sexual Abuse. 29(7). 636–657. 23 indexed citations
5.
Cortoni, Franca, Jeffrey C. Sandler, & Naomi J. Freeman. (2014). Women Convicted of Promoting Prostitution of a Minor Are Different From Women Convicted of Traditional Sexual Offenses. Sexual Abuse. 27(3). 324–334. 9 indexed citations
6.
Sandler, Jeffrey C., et al.. (2013). Predicting Institutional Sexual Misconduct by Adult Male Sex Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 40(10). 1131–1148. 6 indexed citations
7.
Levenson, Jill S., Jeffrey C. Sandler, & Naomi J. Freeman. (2012). Failure-to-register laws and public safety: An examination of risk factors and sex offense recidivism.. Law and Human Behavior. 36(6). 555–565. 9 indexed citations
8.
Sandler, Jeffrey C., et al.. (2012). The Static-99 as a Predictor of Institutional Conduct by Adult Male Sex Offenders. PsycEXTRA Dataset. 1 indexed citations
9.
Freeman, Naomi J., et al.. (2010). Female sex offenders and the criminal justice system: A comparison of arrests and outcomes. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 17(1). 61–76. 21 indexed citations
10.
Freeman, Naomi J., Jeffrey C. Sandler, & Kelly M. Socia. (2009). A time‐series analysis on the impact of sex offender registration and community notification laws on plea bargaining rates. Criminal Justice Studies. 22(2). 153–165. 5 indexed citations
11.
Freeman, Naomi J.. (2009). The Public Safety Impact of Community Notification Laws. Crime & Delinquency. 58(4). 539–564. 28 indexed citations
12.
Sandler, Jeffrey C. & Naomi J. Freeman. (2009). Female Sex Offender Recidivism: A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis. Sexual Abuse. 21(4). 455–473. 44 indexed citations
13.
Freeman, Naomi J. & Jeffrey C. Sandler. (2008). Female and Male Sex Offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 23(10). 1394–1413. 67 indexed citations
14.
Sandler, Jeffrey C., Naomi J. Freeman, & Kelly M. Socia. (2008). Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State's sex offender registration and notification law.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 14(4). 284–302. 164 indexed citations
15.
Sandler, Jeffrey C. & Naomi J. Freeman. (2007). Topology of Female Sex Offenders: A Test of Vandiver and Kercher. Sexual Abuse. 19(2). 73–89. 56 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Naomi J.. (2007). Predictors of Rearrest for Rapists and Child Molesters On Probation. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 34(6). 752–768. 12 indexed citations
17.
Sandler, Jeffrey C. & Naomi J. Freeman. (2007). Typology of Female Sex Offenders: A Test of Vandiver and Kercher. Sexual Abuse. 19(2). 73–89. 44 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, Naomi J.. (2006). Socioeconomic Status and Belief in a Just World: Sentencing of Criminal Defendants1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36(10). 2379–2394. 38 indexed citations
19.
Bartol, Curt R. & Naomi J. Freeman. (2005). History of the American Association for Correctional Psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 32(2). 123–142. 4 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, Naomi J., et al.. (2001). Effects of DNA and Eyewitness Evidence on Juror Decisions. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research. 6(3). 109–117. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026