Naomi Doi

414 citations
33 papers · 332 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 14
    • Paleopathology and ancient diseases 4
    • Forensic and Genetic Research 6

Naomi Doi

30 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Naomi Doi
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Archeology 151
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 32
  • Anthropology 56
  • Paleontology 42
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 88
Replace Xiaoyun Cai with:
Xiaoyun Cai China
Pille Hallast Estonia
Nadia Aleyna Scott Germany
Eduardo de la Vega United States
Amanda M. Papakyrikos United States
Lisa Nevell United States
Richard T. Koritzer United States
J.R. Kidd United States
Milovan Kubat Croatia
Joyce E. Sirianni United States
Naomi Doi relative to Xiaoyun Cai China Xiaoyun Cai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Xiaoyun Cai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Doi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Doi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Doi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Doi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Doi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Doi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Doi. The network helps show where Naomi Doi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Naomi Doi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Naomi Doi Line = papers co-authored together Naomi Doi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199844
2 199838
3 201032
4 200131
5 200321
6 200018
7 200517
8 199117
9 200815
10 198714
11 198611
12 200710
13 19988
14 19908
15 19928
16 19998
17 20025
18 20014
19 20114
20 20183

About Naomi Doi

Naomi Doi is a scholar working on Archeology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Paleontology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (14 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (5 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (5 papers), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (3 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (151 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (32 citations), Anthropology (56 citations), Paleontology (42 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (88 citations). Naomi Doi has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yukio Dodo, Osamu Kondo, John A. Russell, Mayank B. Dutia, Yoshiyuki Tanaka, Minoru Yoneda, Nobuaki Hori, Gareth Leng, Colin H. Brown and Satoshi Miyahara. Their work appears in journals such as Anthropological Science, Neuroscience, British Journal of Pharmacology, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology and Archaeometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact