Anthropological Science

589 papers and 6.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 589 papers published in Anthropological Science in the last decades have received a total of 6.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropological Science usually cover Archeology (268 papers), Genetics (159 papers) and Paleontology (114 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (262 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (106 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropological Science are Reiko T. Kono, Hajime Ishida, Hirofumi Matsumura, Makiko Kouchi, Yousuke Kaifu, Osamu Kondo, Yukio Dodo, Kenichi Aoki, Tsunehiko Hanihara and Gen Suwa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Anthropological Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropological Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropological Science.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropological Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropological Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropological Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropological Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025