Nadia Aleyna Scott

482 total citations
10 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Nadia Aleyna Scott is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Geometry and Topology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Aleyna Scott has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Geometry and Topology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nadia Aleyna Scott's work include Morphological variations and asymmetry (4 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers). Nadia Aleyna Scott is often cited by papers focused on Morphological variations and asymmetry (4 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (3 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (3 papers). Nadia Aleyna Scott collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Austria. Nadia Aleyna Scott's co-authors include Philipp Gunz, Simon Neubauer, Timothy H. Murphy, Jean‐Jacques Hublin, M. Christopher Dean, Fred Spoor, Amandus Kwekason, Philipp Mitterœcker, Jonathan R. Epp and Liisa A.M. Galea and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Aleyna Scott

10 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers

Nadia Aleyna Scott

ANTHR

PALEO

GT

CN

CMN

Anne Hambücken France

R. L. HOLLOWAY United States

José Manuel de la Cuétara Spain

Eva K. Sawyer United States

Aurélien Mounier France

Naomi Doi Japan

Vanessa Rodrigues Paixão‐Côrtes Brazil

Amanda M. Papakyrikos United States

Ralph Holloway United States

Nada Khreisheh United States

Anne Hambücken France

Nadia Aleyna Scott

110 ×0.8

ANTHR

89 ×0.8

PALEO

15 ×0.2

GT

190 ×2.3

CN

177 ×2.6

CMN

Citations per year, relative to Nadia Aleyna Scott Nadia Aleyna Scott (= 1×) peers Anne Hambücken

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Aleyna Scott

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Aleyna Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Aleyna Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Aleyna Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Aleyna Scott

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Aleyna Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Aleyna Scott. The network helps show where Nadia Aleyna Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Aleyna Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Aleyna Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Aleyna Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Aleyna Scott. Nadia Aleyna Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna, et al.. (2022). COVID-19 Risk Perception, Trust in Institutions and Negative Affect Drive Positive COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions. International Journal of Public Health. 67. 1604231–1604231. 16 indexed citations

2.

Neubauer, Simon, Philipp Gunz, Nadia Aleyna Scott, Jean‐Jacques Hublin, & Philipp Mitterœcker. (2020). Evolution of brain lateralization: A shared hominid pattern of endocranial asymmetry is much more variable in humans than in great apes. Science Advances. 6(7). eaax9935–eaax9935. 58 indexed citations

3.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna, André Strauss, Jean‐Jacques Hublin, Philipp Gunz, & Simon Neubauer. (2018). Covariation of the endocranium and splanchnocranium during great ape ontogeny. PLoS ONE. 13(12). e0208999–e0208999. 9 indexed citations

4.

Spoor, Fred, Philipp Gunz, Simon Neubauer, et al.. (2015). Reconstructed Homo habilis type OH 7 suggests deep-rooted species diversity in early Homo. Nature. 519(7541). 83–86. 112 indexed citations

5.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna. (2015). Cortical specificity in neurovascular coupling. Journal of Neurophysiology. 114(6). 3031–3032. 2 indexed citations

6.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna, Simon Neubauer, Jean‐Jacques Hublin, & Philipp Gunz. (2014). A Shared Pattern of Postnatal Endocranial Development in Extant Hominoids. Evolutionary Biology. 41(4). 572–594. 32 indexed citations

7.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna & Timothy H. Murphy. (2012). Hemodynamic Responses Evoked by Neuronal Stimulation via Channelrhodopsin-2 Can Be Independent of Intracortical Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission. PLoS ONE. 7(1). e29859–e29859. 46 indexed citations

8.

Scott, Nadia Aleyna, Timothy H. Murphy, & Judy Illes. (2012). Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging Research: A Framework for Anticipating the Next Frontier. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 7(1). 53–57. 5 indexed citations

9.

Alford, Spencer C., Adam Watson, Nadia Aleyna Scott, et al.. (2010). Soluble ephrin a1 is necessary for the growth of HeLa and SK-BR3 cells. Cancer Cell International. 10(1). 41–41. 26 indexed citations

10.

Epp, Jonathan R., Nadia Aleyna Scott, & Liisa A.M. Galea. (2010). Strain differences in neurogenesis and activation of new neurons in the dentate gyrus in response to spatial learning. Neuroscience. 172. 342–354. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact