Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Physiology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Aurora Bueno‐CavanillasCarmen Amezcua‐PrietoKhalid S. KhanSandra Martín‐PeláezBlanca Riquelme‐GallegoJuan Miguel Martínez‐GalianoMaría‐Jesús Oliveras‐LópezAnne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael
- Topics
- Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers)Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers)Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthHealth Informatics
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsNutrients
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomEgypt
In The Last Decade
Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
31 papers receiving 425 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 149
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 81
- General Health Professions 71
- Physiology 68
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 67
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez. The network helps show where Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez. Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez
Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Informatics and Pharmacy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nutritional Studies and Diet (7 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (7 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (81 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (149 citations) and Health Informatics (5 citations). Naomi Cano‐Ibáñez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Aurora Bueno‐Cavanillas, Carmen Amezcua‐Prieto, Khalid S. Khan, Sandra Martín‐Peláez, Blanca Riquelme‐Gallego, Juan Miguel Martínez‐Galiano, María‐Jesús Oliveras‐López, Anne-Mary Lewis-Mikhael, Miguel Delgado‐Rodríguez and Rocío Olmedo‐Requena. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Nutrients.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.