Naoki Nakano
- Surgery top 2%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 5%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Vikas KhandujaRyosuke KurodaTomoyuki MatsumotoKoji TakayamaMasahiro KurosakaTakehiko MatsushitaKazunari IshidaShinya Hayashi
- Topics
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (68 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (66 papers)Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (36 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited KingdomBelgium
In The Last Decade
Naoki Nakano
99 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Surgery 1.2k
- Rheumatology 201
- Biomedical Engineering 186
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 185
- Physiology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Naoki Nakano
This map shows the geographic impact of Naoki Nakano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naoki Nakano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naoki Nakano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naoki Nakano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naoki Nakano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naoki Nakano. The network helps show where Naoki Nakano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naoki Nakano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naoki Nakano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naoki Nakano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naoki Nakano. Naoki Nakano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | 45 | |
| 20 | [Bupivacaine-fentanyl continuous infusion is superior to morphine bolus injection in postoperative epidural analgesia]. | 2 |
About Naoki Nakano
Naoki Nakano is a scholar working on Surgery, Rheumatology and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 118 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (68 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (66 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (1.2k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (185 citations) and Rheumatology (201 citations). Naoki Nakano has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Vikas Khanduja, Ryosuke Kuroda, Tomoyuki Matsumoto, Koji Takayama, Masahiro Kurosaka, Takehiko Matsushita, Kazunari Ishida, Shinya Hayashi, Yuichi Kuroda and John E. Lawrence. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and The American Journal of Sports Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.