A. Paul Monk

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
92 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

A. Paul Monk is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, A. Paul Monk has authored 92 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Surgery, 18 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 13 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in A. Paul Monk's work include Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (56 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (34 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (33 papers). A. Paul Monk is often cited by papers focused on Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (56 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (34 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (33 papers). A. Paul Monk collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and United States. A. Paul Monk's co-authors include David Beard, Lee Bayliss, Andrew Price, Simon W. Young, S. Glyn-Jones, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra, Andrew Carr, Andrew Judge, David Culliford and Cyrus Cooper and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

A. Paul Monk

85 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study

2017 570 citations A. Paul Monk et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
A. Paul Monk New Zealand	24	1.7k	424	301	284	107	92	2.0k
Thomas J. Heyse Germany	29	2.3k 1.3×	284 0.7×	271 0.9×	246 0.9×	103 1.0×	120	2.5k
Tim Board United Kingdom	26	1.8k 1.0×	227 0.5×	253 0.8×	279 1.0×	213 2.0×	129	2.1k
Joan Carles Monllau Spain	27	1.7k 1.0×	602 1.4×	548 1.8×	366 1.3×	83 0.8×	123	2.3k
Chadwick C. Prodromos United States	16	1.6k 0.9×	892 2.1×	393 1.3×	274 1.0×	141 1.3×	38	1.8k
Daniel C. Wascher United States	18	1.6k 0.9×	523 1.2×	249 0.8×	264 0.9×	91 0.9×	50	1.8k
Jeffrey J. Cherian United States	28	2.2k 1.3×	677 1.6×	289 1.0×	230 0.8×	74 0.7×	86	2.6k
William Breidahl Australia	23	1.7k 1.0×	531 1.3×	120 0.4×	252 0.9×	224 2.1×	66	2.0k
W. Schultz Germany	24	1.0k 0.6×	447 1.1×	210 0.7×	365 1.3×	306 2.9×	66	1.6k
Constantine K. Demetropoulos United States	22	1.2k 0.7×	472 1.1×	467 1.6×	210 0.7×	84 0.8×	58	1.6k
Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi Brazil	18	772 0.5×	448 1.1×	320 1.1×	135 0.5×	64 0.6×	74	987

Countries citing papers authored by A. Paul Monk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Paul Monk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Paul Monk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Paul Monk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Paul Monk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Paul Monk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Paul Monk. The network helps show where A. Paul Monk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Paul Monk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Paul Monk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Paul Monk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Paul Monk. A. Paul Monk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tay, Mei Lin, Scott M. Bolam, Lydia Lin, et al.. (2025). Magnetic resonance imaging provides additional utility in the preoperative cartilage assessment of patients undergoing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 33(6). 2214–2221.

Bok, Arnold, Scott M. Bolam, Gary J. Hooper, et al.. (2025). Uncemented Oxford mobile‐bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty demonstrates superior long‐term implant survival compared to cemented fixation in patients under 60 years. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

Slullitel, Pablo A., Bülent Atılla, Saif Salih, et al.. (2025). Comparison of Microbiological Profiles of Primary Hip and Knee Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated at Specialist Centers Around the World. Microorganisms. 13(7). 1505–1505.

Stanley, James, et al.. (2024). Reduction in re-rupture rates following implementation of return-to-sport testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in 313 patients with a mean follow-up of 50 months. Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. 9(3). 264–271. 6 indexed citations

Tay, Mei Lin, A. Paul Monk, Chris Frampton, Gary J. Hooper, & Simon W. Young. (2023). Associations of the Oxford Knee Score and knee arthroplasty revision at long‐term follow‐up. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 93(1-2). 310–315. 4 indexed citations

Tay, Mei Lin, A. Paul Monk, Chris Frampton, Gary J. Hooper, & Simon W. Young. (2023). The Strongest Oxford Knee Score Predictors of Subsequent Revision are “Overall Pain,” “Limping When Walking,” and “Knee Giving Way”. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 38(7). S156–S161.e3. 5 indexed citations

Tay, Mei Lin, et al.. (2023). Similar Survivorship but Different Revision Reasons for Uncemented Mobile-Bearing and Cemented Fixed-Bearing Medial UKA. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 105(10). 755–761. 8 indexed citations

Tay, Mei Lin, Scott M. Bolam, A. Paul Monk, et al.. (2023). Better post‐operative outcomes at 1‐year follow‐up are associated with lower levels of pre‐operative synovitis and higher levels of IL‐6 and VEGFA in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 31(10). 4109–4116. 5 indexed citations

Bolam, Scott M., Mark Zhu, Khoon S. Lim, et al.. (2023). Combined Growth Factor Hydrogel Enhances Rotator Cuff Enthesis Healing in Rat But Not Sheep Model. Tissue Engineering Part A. 29(15-16). 449–459. 6 indexed citations

10.

Tay, Mei Lin, A. Paul Monk, Christopher Frampton, Gary J. Hooper, & Simon W. Young. (2023). A comparison of clinical thresholds for revision following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The Bone & Joint Journal. 105-B(3). 269–276. 14 indexed citations

11.

Bolam, Scott M., et al.. (2023). INTRODUCTION OF ROSA ROBOTIC ARM SYSTEM FOR TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IS ASSOCIATED WITH A MINIMAL LEARNING CURVE FOR OPERATIVE TIME. Orthopaedic Proceedings. 105-B(SUPP_3). 78–78. 3 indexed citations

12.

Bolam, Scott M., G. Gamble, Sarah‐Jane Paine, et al.. (2023). ETHNICITY, SEX, AND SOCIOECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN THE TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC ROTATOR CUFF INJURIES IN AOTEAROA, NEW ZEALAND. Orthopaedic Proceedings. 105-B(SUPP_3). 77–77.

13.

Munro, Jacob T., et al.. (2023). Increasing femoral head size from 32 mm to 36 mm does not increase the revision risk for total hip replacement: a New Zealand joint registry study. Hip International. 34(1). 66–73.

14.

Luyckx, Thomas, A. Paul Monk, Jacobus H. Müller, et al.. (2022). What are the perceived benefits and barriers to the use of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty? A survey of members of the European Knee Society. International Orthopaedics. 47(2). 405–412. 10 indexed citations

15.

Bolam, Scott M., et al.. (2022). Tibial metaphyseal cones combined with short stems perform as well as long stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 92(9). 2254–2260. 6 indexed citations

16.

Tay, Mei Lin, Brya G. Matthews, A. Paul Monk, & Simon W. Young. (2022). Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine. 7(5). 132–141. 22 indexed citations

17.

Bolam, Scott M., Karen E. Callon, Brendan Coleman, et al.. (2022). Cytotoxicity of tranexamic acid to tendon and bone in vitro: Is there a safe dosage?. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 17(1). 273–273. 7 indexed citations

18.

Bolam, Scott M., et al.. (2022). Introduction of ROSA robotic‐arm system for total knee arthroplasty is associated with a minimal learning curve for operative time. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. 9(1). 86–86. 33 indexed citations

19.

Tay, Mei Lin, Sue R. McGlashan, A. Paul Monk, & Simon W. Young. (2021). Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 142(2). 301–314. 54 indexed citations

20.

Bolam, Scott M., et al.. (2020). Toxicity of tranexamic acid (TXA) to intra‐articular tissue in orthopaedic surgery: a scoping review. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. 29(6). 1862–1871. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact