Nanna Lien

6.0k citations
134 papers · 4.5k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

Nanna Lien

131 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Nanna Lien
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.1k
  • Applied Psychology 243
  • Pharmacy 121
  • General Health Professions 631
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 321
Replace Saskia J. te Velde with:
Saskia J. te Velde Netherlands
Leslie A. Lytle United States
Teresia M. O’Connor United States
Mette Rasmussen Denmark
Jeanne P. Goldberg United States
Elling Bere Norway
Leslie Lytle United States
Peter Kremer Australia
Christina D. Economos United States
Nalini Ranjit United States
Nanna Lien relative to Saskia J. te Velde Netherlands Saskia J. te Velde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Saskia J. te Velde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nanna Lien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nanna Lien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanna Lien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanna Lien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nanna Lien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nanna Lien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nanna Lien. The network helps show where Nanna Lien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nanna Lien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nanna Lien Line = papers co-authored together Nanna Lien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012240
2 2001229
3 2017171
4 2005166
5 2018163
6 2018162
7 2006143
8 2002135
9 2002115
10 2014104
11 2012100
12 201098
13 200685
14 201785
15 201383
16 201277
17 201877
18 201372
19 201670
20 201669

About Nanna Lien

Nanna Lien is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Physiology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (75 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (10 papers), Community Health and Development (10 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (6 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (5 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.1k citations), Applied Psychology (243 citations), Pharmacy (121 citations), General Health Professions (631 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (321 citations). Nanna Lien has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Knut‐Inge Klepp, Mona Bjelland, Lene Frost Andersen, Gerd Holmboe‐Ottesen, Ingunn Holden Bergh, Johannes Brug, May Grydeland, Zumin Shi, Mekdes K. Gebremariam and Yngvar Ommundsen. Their work appears in journals such as Obesity Reviews, Public Health Nutrition, BMC Public Health, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity and Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact