Nancy Shields Kollmann
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Daniel KaiserGary MarkerMichael S. FlierSamuel H. BaronMaureen PerrieJanet MartinRichard HellieBrian Davies
- Topics
- Soviet and Russian History (6 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers)Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nancy Shields Kollmann
22 papers receiving 95 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Political Science and International Relations 97
- History 52
- Sociology and Political Science 45
- Anthropology 23
- Economics and Econometrics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Shields Kollmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Shields Kollmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Shields Kollmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Shields Kollmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Shields Kollmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Shields Kollmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Shields Kollmann. The network helps show where Nancy Shields Kollmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Shields Kollmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Shields Kollmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Shields Kollmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Shields Kollmann. Nancy Shields Kollmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Major problems in early modern Russian history | 2 |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nancy Shields Kollmann
Nancy Shields Kollmann is a scholar working on Classics, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 177 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (52 citations), Classics (15 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (97 citations). Nancy Shields Kollmann has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Kaiser, Gary Marker, Michael S. Flier, Samuel H. Baron, Maureen Perrie, Janet Martin, Richard Hellie, Brian Davies, Valerie A. Kivelson and Simon Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Russian Review and The Slavic and East European Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.