Malcolm Gaskill

587 citations
16 papers · 158 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • History top 2%
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Historical Economic and Social Studies 8
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 5
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 4
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 1

Malcolm Gaskill

13 papers receiving 96 citations

Peers

Malcolm Gaskill
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • History 82
  • Classics 15
  • Literature and Literary Theory 27
  • Anthropology 20
  • Philosophy 21
Replace Peter Rushton with:
Peter Rushton United Kingdom
Tim Harris United States
Philip Benedict United States
Bob Scribner United Kingdom
Alastair Bellany Netherlands
Donald B. Epstein
Charles Carlton United States
Clarke Garrett United States
Kaspar von Greyerz Switzerland
Réamonn Ó Muirí
Malcolm Gaskill relative to Peter Rushton United Kingdom Peter Rushton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Rushton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Gaskill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Gaskill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Gaskill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Gaskill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Gaskill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Gaskill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Gaskill. The network helps show where Malcolm Gaskill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Gaskill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Gaskill Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Gaskill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200046
2 199823
3 200017
4 200815
5 200814
6 199812
7 199611
8
Hellish Nell: Last of Britain's Witches
20017
9 20103
10 20103
11 19932
12
The Matthew Hopkins Trials
20031
13
Spellbound: Magic, Ritual and Witchcraft
20181
14 20071
15 20111
16 20131

About Malcolm Gaskill

Malcolm Gaskill is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 16 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (8 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (5 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (82 citations), Classics (15 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (27 citations), Anthropology (20 citations) and Philosophy (21 citations). Malcolm Gaskill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Owen Davies. Their work appears in journals such as The Historical Journal, Social History, Past & Present, The English Historical Review and Continuity and Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact