John Bossy

1.8k citations
34 papers · 609 indexed · h-index 13

John Bossy

26 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

John Bossy
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Classics 117
  • History 325
  • Religious studies 63
  • History and Philosophy of Science 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 201
Replace Nicholas Terpstra with:
Nicholas Terpstra Canada
Lauro Martines United States
Diarmaid MacCulloch United Kingdom
R. Po‐chia Hsia United States
Mark Goldie United Kingdom
Patrick Collinson United Kingdom
Merry E. Wiesner United States
Robert Tittler Canada
Susan Mosher Stuard United States
Owen Chadwick United States
John Bossy relative to Nicholas Terpstra Canada Nicholas Terpstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nicholas Terpstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bossy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bossy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bossy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bossy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bossy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bossy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bossy. The network helps show where John Bossy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Bossy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bossy Line = papers co-authored together John Bossy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20100
2
Progress of a sort
20050
3 20040
4 20001
5 19988
6 199112
7 19918
8 198741
9 198699
10 198574
11 198224
12 19817
13
Manfred Porkert : The theoretical foundations of Chinese medicine. Systems of correspondence
19771
14 19774
15
Essays presented to Michael Roberts : sometime professor of modern history in the Queen's University of Belfast
19761
16 197550
17 197323
18 19657
19 19644
20 19593

About John Bossy

John Bossy is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Museology, Political Science and International Relations and Religious studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 609 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (13 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers) and Historical Economic and Legal Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (117 citations), History (325 citations), Religious studies (63 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (201 citations). John Bossy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sally Engle Merry, Jaroslav Pelikán, Barbara A. Hanawalt, William Ian Miller, Henry Kamen, T. H. Aston, Christopher Hill, Thomas Mayer, Pierre Huard and Michael Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Past & Present, The American Historical Review, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, The English Historical Review and American Journal of Legal History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026