Nancy Haff

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
33 papers, 961 citations indexed

About

Nancy Haff is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy Haff has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 961 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Family Practice, 13 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 9 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Nancy Haff's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (10 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (9 papers). Nancy Haff is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (10 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (9 papers). Nancy Haff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Switzerland. Nancy Haff's co-authors include David A. Asch, Jingsan Zhu, Mitesh S. Patel, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Julie C. Lauffenburger, Xingmei Wang, Roya Ghazinouri, Lisa Wesby, Roy Rosin and Lin Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, PLoS ONE and CHEST Journal.

In The Last Decade

Nancy Haff

27 papers receiving 929 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Association of a Smartphone Application With Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control

2018 224 citations Roya Ghazinouri, Julie C. Lauffenburger et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nancy Haff United States	11	432	288	263	210	157	33	961
Karen Hoffer United States	8	278 0.6×	219 0.8×	229 0.9×	170 0.8×	56 0.4×	16	660
Chun‐Ja Kim South Korea	20	390 0.9×	94 0.3×	213 0.8×	153 0.7×	120 0.8×	67	1.2k
Ratna Sohanpal United Kingdom	18	494 1.1×	128 0.4×	155 0.6×	133 0.6×	75 0.5×	44	1.1k
Charles Rareshide United States	19	427 1.0×	154 0.5×	244 0.9×	345 1.6×	130 0.8×	44	1.1k
Neeltje van den Berg Germany	21	530 1.2×	102 0.4×	114 0.4×	330 1.6×	78 0.5×	117	1.4k
Rianne van der Kleij Netherlands	19	433 1.0×	109 0.4×	173 0.7×	260 1.2×	44 0.3×	54	989
Mia Cajita United States	14	573 1.3×	103 0.4×	89 0.3×	160 0.8×	260 1.7×	32	1.1k
Susan Butterworth United States	13	354 0.8×	157 0.5×	103 0.4×	118 0.6×	60 0.4×	30	887
Philippa Seaton New Zealand	12	565 1.3×	126 0.4×	209 0.8×	238 1.1×	51 0.3×	23	1.2k
Lisa Wesby United States	10	301 0.7×	261 0.9×	290 1.1×	291 1.4×	41 0.3×	11	783

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Haff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Haff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Haff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Haff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Haff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Haff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Haff. The network helps show where Nancy Haff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Haff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Haff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Haff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Haff. Nancy Haff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dhand, Amar, et al.. (2025). Social network intervention to improve blood pressure control after stroke: The TEAMS-BP randomized clinical trial. Social Science & Medicine. 380. 118231–118231.

Jungo, Katharina Tabea, et al.. (2025). Feasibility and Acceptability of Engaging Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia With Electronic Outreach for Deprescribing. The Gerontologist. 65(4).

Limbani, Felix, Ndaziona Peter Kwanjo Banda, G. Blaise, et al.. (2024). IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES AND SUCCESSES OF A MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PATIENTS WITH HYPOXEMIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE AT FIVE HOSPITALS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA. CHEST Journal. 166(4). A6414–A6415.

Choudhry, Niteesh K., et al.. (2024). Disentangling drug contributions: anticholinergic burden in older adults linked to individual medications: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Geriatrics. 24(1). 44–44. 3 indexed citations

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Elad Yom‐Tov, Punam Anand Keller, et al.. (2024). The impact of using reinforcement learning to personalize communication on medication adherence: findings from the REINFORCE trial. npj Digital Medicine. 7(1). 39–39. 10 indexed citations

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Erin Kim, Nancy Haff, et al.. (2024). Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high‐risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 72(5). 1420–1430.

Haff, Nancy, et al.. (2023). “How” Versus “Why” Messaging to Increase Uptake of Booster Vaccination Against COVID-19: Results of a Pragmatic Randomized Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 39(4). 611–618.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Rasha Khatib, Michelle A. Albert, et al.. (2023). Clinicians’ and Patients’ Perspectives on Hypertension Care in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population in Primary Care. JAMA Network Open. 6(2). e230977–e230977. 6 indexed citations

Haff, Nancy, Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara, Wendy Wood, et al.. (2023). Testing interventions to reduce clinical inertia in the treatment of hypertension: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. American Heart Journal. 268. 18–28. 3 indexed citations

10.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Erin Kim, Maxwell Coll, et al.. (2022). Overcoming Decisional Gaps in High-Risk Prescribing by Junior Physicians Using Simulation-Based Training: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 11(4). e31464–e31464. 2 indexed citations

11.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Maxwell Coll, Erin Kim, et al.. (2022). Prescribing decision making by medical residents on night shifts: A qualitative study. Medical Education. 56(10). 1032–1041. 7 indexed citations

12.

Haff, Nancy, Niteesh K. Choudhry, Thomas Isaac, et al.. (2022). Disagreement between pharmacy claims and direct interview to identify patients with non-adherence to chronic cardiometabolic medications. American Heart Journal. 256. 51–59. 2 indexed citations

13.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Nancy Haff, Marie E. McDonnell, et al.. (2021). Exploring patient experiences coping with using multiple medications: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 11(11). e046860–e046860. 7 indexed citations

14.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Thomas Isaac, Lorenzo Trippa, et al.. (2021). Rationale and design of the Novel Uses of adaptive Designs to Guide provider Engagement in Electronic Health Records (NUDGE-EHR) pragmatic adaptive randomized trial: a trial protocol. Implementation Science. 16(1). 9–9. 15 indexed citations

15.

Fontanet, Constance P., Niteesh K. Choudhry, Wendy Wood, et al.. (2021). Randomised controlled trial targeting habit formation to improve medication adherence to daily oral medications in patients with gout. BMJ Open. 11(11). e055930–e055930. 3 indexed citations

16.

Haff, Nancy, et al.. (2021). Association Between Cost-Saving Prescription Policy Changes and Adherence to Chronic Disease Medications: an Observational Study. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 37(3). 531–538. 2 indexed citations

17.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Punam Anand Keller, Marie E. McDonnell, et al.. (2021). Preferences for mHealth Technology and Text Messaging Communication in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(6). e25958–e25958. 13 indexed citations

18.

Choudhry, Niteesh K., Constance P. Fontanet, Roya Ghazinouri, et al.. (2021). Design of the Spine Pain Intervention to Enhance Care Quality And Reduce Expenditure Trial (SPINE CARE) study: Methods and lessons from a multi-site pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 111. 106602–106602. 1 indexed citations

19.

Lauffenburger, Julie C., Roya Ghazinouri, Saira Jan, et al.. (2019). Impact of a novel pharmacist-delivered behavioral intervention for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes: The ENhancing outcomes through Goal Assessment and Generating Engagement in Diabetes Mellitus (ENGAGE-DM) pragmatic randomized trial. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0214754–e0214754. 34 indexed citations

20.

Patel, Mitesh S., David A. Asch, Roy Rosin, et al.. (2016). Individual Versus Team-Based Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 31(7). 746–754. 108 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact