Karen Hoffer
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 8
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 7
- Healthcare Policy and Management 4
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 3
- Co-authors
- Jingsan Zhu (13 shared papers)Kevin G. Volpp (13 shared papers)David A. Asch (10 shared papers)Dylan S. Small (5 shared papers)Mitesh S. Patel (5 shared papers)Victoria Hilbert (5 shared papers)D. Shuttleworth (5 shared papers)Roy Rosin (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- JAMA Network Open (3 papers)American Journal of Health Promotion (2 papers)JAMA (1 paper)Clinical Trials (1 paper)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Karen Hoffer
16 papers receiving 644 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Applied Psychology 219
- Family Practice 59
- General Decision Sciences 28
- General Health Professions 278
- Physiology 229
Countries citing papers authored by Karen Hoffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Hoffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Hoffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Hoffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Hoffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Hoffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Hoffer. The network helps show where Karen Hoffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen Hoffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 202 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 129 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 108 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 10 | Patients' views of a behavioral intervention including financial incentives. | 2017 | 6 |
| 11 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 2 |
About Karen Hoffer
Karen Hoffer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics, Applied Psychology, Physiology and General Health Professions, having authored 16 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (219 citations), Family Practice (59 citations), General Decision Sciences (28 citations), General Health Professions (278 citations) and Physiology (229 citations). Karen Hoffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jingsan Zhu, Kevin G. Volpp, David A. Asch, Dylan S. Small, Mitesh S. Patel, Victoria Hilbert, D. Shuttleworth, Roy Rosin, Scarlett L. Bellamy and Lin Yang. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Network Open, American Journal of Health Promotion, JAMA, Clinical Trials and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.