Nancy C. Wright
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- David D. KilmerSusan G. AitkensMegan A. McCroryE. M. BernauerM. A. ChaudhryR. E. J. DyballKeiichi HondaWilliam M. Fowler
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers)Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (4 papers)Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of PhysiologyArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nancy C. Wright
13 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Molecular Biology 211
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 169
- Neurology 135
- Genetics 119
- Psychiatry and Mental health 89
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy C. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy C. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy C. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy C. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy C. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy C. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy C. Wright. The network helps show where Nancy C. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy C. Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy C. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy C. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy C. Wright. Nancy C. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 56 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 82 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | The use of gait analysis in the evaluation of patients with myelomeningocele | 3 |
| 13 | 50 |
About Nancy C. Wright
Nancy C. Wright is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Genetics and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (8 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (4 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (119 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (169 citations) and Neurology (135 citations). Nancy C. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David D. Kilmer, Susan G. Aitkens, Megan A. McCrory, E. M. Bernauer, M. A. Chaudhry, R. E. J. Dyball, Keiichi Honda, William M. Fowler, Richard T. Abresch and ER Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.