Keiichi Honda
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Hisashi ÔmuraNanao HayashiH. NegoroTakashi HiguchiS. TakanoTatsuo YamauchiR. E. J. DyballFumiko Abe
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (45 papers)Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (24 papers)Insect Pheromone Research and Control (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Keiichi Honda
85 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 992
- Insect Science 785
- Plant Science 641
- Genetics 415
- Molecular Biology 307
Countries citing papers authored by Keiichi Honda
This map shows the geographic impact of Keiichi Honda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keiichi Honda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keiichi Honda more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Keiichi Honda
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keiichi Honda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keiichi Honda. The network helps show where Keiichi Honda may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keiichi Honda
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keiichi Honda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keiichi Honda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keiichi Honda. Keiichi Honda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | Chemical nature of volatile compounds from the valvae and wings of male Delias butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). | 4 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 60 | |
| 19 | Two glycyrrhizin isomers and their application to cosmetics | 1 |
| 20 | 12 |
About Keiichi Honda
Keiichi Honda is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (45 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (24 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (785 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (992 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (262 citations). Keiichi Honda has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hisashi Ômura, Nanao Hayashi, H. Negoro, Takashi Higuchi, S. Takano, Tatsuo Yamauchi, Takashi Higuchi, R. E. J. Dyball, Fumiko Abe and Tadanobu Nakayama. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.