Nahed M. Ali

413 citations
14 papers · 287 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nahed M. Ali

13 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Nahed M. Ali
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Parasitology 47
  • Safety Research 35
  • Hematology 31
  • Physiology 70
Replace C. M. Kihamia with:
C. M. Kihamia Tanzania
Emmanuel Kafwembe Zambia
H.A. Addy Ghana
Melkamu Bedimo Beyene Ethiopia
Patrick Kaonga Zambia
Arthur Kwena Kenya
Beatrice Mtimuni Malawi
Fatou Berthé United States
Nicky Baker Australia
Sumon K. Das Bangladesh
Nahed M. Ali relative to C. M. Kihamia Tanzania C. M. Kihamia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
C. M. Kihamia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nahed M. Ali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nahed M. Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nahed M. Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nahed M. Ali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nahed M. Ali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nahed M. Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nahed M. Ali. The network helps show where Nahed M. Ali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nahed M. Ali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nahed M. Ali Line = papers co-authored together Nahed M. Ali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 199958
2 201555
3 200331
4 201730
5 200828
6 201125
7 201123
8 202119
9 20218
10 20214
11 20233
12 20122
13 20191
14
Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude of Graduate Students toward the Protection of Human Subjects in Research: A Pilot Study
20130

About Nahed M. Ali

Nahed M. Ali is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Safety Research, having authored 14 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (1 paper), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Paleopathology and ancient diseases (1 paper), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (1 paper) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (14 citations), Parasitology (47 citations), Safety Research (35 citations), Hematology (31 citations) and Physiology (70 citations). Nahed M. Ali has collaborated with scholars based in Egypt, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Fouad N. Boctor, Jie Chen, Joan Uehlinger, K. Mohandas, Samah S. Abbas, Sawsan M. Amer, Henry Silverman, Jeanne V. Linden, Louis M. Weiss and Jing Ja Yoon. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Transfusion, Journal of Academic Ethics, BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care and Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact